The correct answer is B because there are websites that list businesses for sale along with contact information for dealing.
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
Preparer penalties are sanctions imposed by the internal revenue code on tax professional who are found negligent in discharging their professional duties in tax matters. These sanctions range from financial fines to imprisonment. And Internal Revenue Code has relevant sections for each category of negligence. Normally, it is the staff personnel that has the highest exposure to the risk of being negligent and tax professionals will put in place adequate measures to reduce this exposure to preparer penalties. One of such measures that are employed to reduce the chances of staff personnel incurring IRS preparer penalties is tone at the top approach. This approach is used by management to establish the ethical value of the firm. It set up the environment in which management relay their commitment to upholding ethical values, such as integrity, diligence and objectivity.
This established tone will serve as guiding map to the staff personnel who are expected to follow the guideline in discharge of their duties. And in turn, this regulated behavior of staff personnel and demonstrated commitment of management to upholding ethical values will help to reduce the chances of staff personnel incurring IRS preparer penalties because of the presence of atmosphere of integrity and diligence in the organisation. So the answer is true.
Answer:
learning
Explanation:
Since in the given situation it is mentioned that the child care center focused on the developing, communicating the new knowledge in order to modify the behavior so here this means that it have the learning environment in the child care center so that everyone could aware of anything also they have dont any problem regarding it. Moreover it increased the skills also
Therefore as per the given situation, the above should be the answer
Answer:
The court ruled against both Americar and Regency Inn, and then Regency Inn won its case against Americar. The nuisance case itself is pretty unpleasant, so it's not worth referring to it.
The fundamentals for the ruling against Americar were that they themselves had drafted the lease agreement and that the clause included in the lease agreement by which they agreed to indemnify Regency Inn was valid. The original lease term had already expired, but Americar continued to lease the offices on a monthly basis. Since they never left the place, the clauses in the original agreement were still valid even though the lease changed to a monthly basis. I.e. if you sign a lease contract and after the original contract is over, you continue to lease the same place, then the clauses from the original contract still apply.
The clause stated that Americar was liable for damages that took place on the leased premises or in their proximity, i.e. the area near their offices. The parking lot was considered to be in the proximity of Americar's offices.
