1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vladimir1956 [14]
3 years ago
7

Compare and contrast the changes in the government, economy, and society from the Romanov era under the tsar to the rule by the

Bolsheviks. (write a two paragraph amswer) 20 POINTS!!!
History
2 answers:
Tresset [83]3 years ago
8 0

The rulers of the Soviet Union viewed empire and imperialism in ideological terms as ‘the highest and final stage of capitalism’.1 By this Leninist definition, the Soviet Union did not identify itself as an empire, and instead, its leaders vehemently denounced imperialism that was carried out by its enemies and competitors: the capitalist states. Despite its own anguish over being identified as an empire, the Soviet Union indeed was one. While the meaning of ‘empire’ has shifted over time, for the purposes of this paper the definition of empire is in the sense of a great power, a polity, ruling over vast territories and people, leaving a significant impact on the history of world civilizations.2 As the characteristics of the Soviet Union are examined, support for viewing the USSR as an empire grows.

The Soviet Union emerged after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The Tsarist Russian Empire’s government was overthrown by the local soviets, led by the Bolsheviks. The Bolsheviks attempted to replace the Russian empire with a communist one, in which socialism would make nationalismobsolete and in place there would be a supra-national imperial ideology.3 Still, coming back to the issue of ‘empire’, the Soviet Union clearly maintained a commanding control over multi-ethnic and multi-linguistic societies that surpassed the extent of the preceding Imperial Russia Empire. A question thus arises: was the USSR a Russian empire? The first aspect to consider is if the USSR was a continuation of Russian imperialist power or if an intrinsic distinction can be made between the two. What is notable to address is what is meant by ‘Russian’ identity and nationality, its formation, and reshaping through time. Once this will be accounted for, this paper will move on with an answer to the question: the USSR was indeed an essentially different empire from the one preceding it, and thus, the USSR was not a Russian empire.


SVEN [57.7K]3 years ago
6 0

The Romanov Era is the period of Imperial Russia. During this time period, the Romanov family ruled Russia through a system of absolute monarchy. The tsar had complete control over all aspects of government, and his position was hereditary. The last tsar of Russia was Nicholas II, whose rule ended as a consequence of the revolution initiated by the Bolsheviks. After the change of authority took place, the Bolsheviks established the Soviet Union, which was ruled through the Politburo in a communist fashion.

Many aspects of society, economy and government changed when this transition took place. In terms of society, the nobility lost a lot of power and recognition, as the Bolsheviks tried to make these titles obsolete. This brought more social equality to people. Another important change was in terms of religion, as the Bolsheviks did not think that religion had a place in a communist country. In terns of the economy, the Soviet Union saw great modernization. The country went from a mostly agrarian economy to one of the most industrialized countries in the world, culminating in the Soviet achievements in the space race during the Cold War. However, the nation also suffered many economic problems, including poverty and famine. Finally, in terms of government, the rule of the Communist party was very different in ideology, as well as in ways of operating. Bureaucracy became more complex, and a position in the government became possible for people without a noble background.

You might be interested in
I need the answer plssssss
aleksley [76]

Answer:

I think C

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Imagine your self in 10 years from now in what ways do you think that your obligations would have changed
lys-0071 [83]

Answer:

Imagineing myself ten years from now can only give me a glimmer of what the future holds for me. Some of them may turn out to be true, while others will not. Regardless, the future should be a thrilling place where anything is conceivable. It's also where we set our goals so that we can work hard to achieve them later.

Explanation:

Thank you for your inquiry. It makes people think about where they are in life right now and where they want to go. It allows them to make a change if they are not on a path that they enjoy. Thank you.

5 0
2 years ago
Which of the following statements is true?
jenyasd209 [6]

Answer:

D is true

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Why have some African nations taken steps towards democracy in recent years?
sasho [114]
The Movement Toward Democracy in Africa

The workshops were convened against the background of what many observers have called the ''second wave of liberation in Africa.'' Authoritarian regimes are being challenged by individuals and movements in search of more democratic forms of governance. Africans in many countries are showing remarkable persistence in forcing their leaders to comply with popular demands for political pluralism to replace the common one-party regimes. Calls for open and democratic governance, characterized by popular participation, competitive elections, and free flow of information can be heard in many African countries.

This new disposition toward democratization in Africa is a consequence of pressures both internal and external to African societies. To be sure, the continent's declining economic fortunes have made people more skeptical and critical of their governments, with new African thinking prompting individuals to move beyond old taboos. Demands from within African countries are pressing leaders to deliver on the promises of economic growth and prosperity they made in order to encourage the acceptance of structural adjustment policies supported by international financial institutions. The new insistence by external aid donors and creditors on good governance also has provided a window of opportunity for African democrats to push for transparency and accountability in their countries. Likewise, the worldwide democratic revolution and its corresponding summons to protect and promote individual human rights have contributed to generating protests

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Civil rights activists in the 1960s used the media to show americans the injustice of the treatment of minorities, successfully
telo118 [61]
It put it onto the policy agenda. Thanks to the media, the civil rights fight started getting supporters from all around america and form all classes and ethnicities. Without the media, we can't know when the civil rights would be won because the people wouldn't have known what was going on and to what degree.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following comic strips did not mak it’s mark during the 1960s?
    8·2 answers
  • How many years are between the Norman conquest and the magna carta
    9·2 answers
  • The convoy system was a successful strategy by the U.S. Navy in the North Atlantic to offset the threat of German U-boats. True
    8·1 answer
  • Who was the fist president in the u.s
    9·2 answers
  • What culture greatly influenced Roman culture?
    6·2 answers
  • Money was more difficult to use in trade than bartering had been. TrueFalse
    5·2 answers
  • If lien had not returned to Russia after the czar stepped down, what would have been the likely outcome of the revolution
    6·1 answer
  • When were these advertisements published?
    8·1 answer
  • PLS HURRY!! I'M TIMED!!!!
    15·2 answers
  • The high middle Ages brought about: A:the rise of the peasantry
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!