<span>The party out of power is capable to criticize and mitigate the behavior and ideas of the party in power. They remain loyal to the people and the nation, but they oppose the powerful party frequently in order to maintain balance.</span>
I think the summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case
Summary judgement is entered by the court if the plaintiff does not have sufficient evidence that the defendants actually do what they're accused of before moving to trial.
On this case, There is a strong proof that peoples restaurant is aware of Hoag's alcoholism : <u>intoxicated</u>
This mean that sabo can proof that the bar know hoag is an alcoholic and had served enough amount to hoag to get him intoxicated.
This mean that Sabo's case is strong enough to be brought to the trial. keep in mind that Sabo is unlikely to win the trial since the restaurant does not directly involved in the accident. but we can definitely say that summary judgement would be inappropriate in this case.
Answer:
A
Explanation:
MLK never wanted violence only peace he preached about peace and justice simple research will teach you that. But the answer is a sir or mam.
answer- a secondary source
explanation-since the author of the souce wasnt in the battle it is a secondary source
Answer: Effective but not efficient
Explanation:
Something is effective if it can help achieve a specific goal, delivering the expected outcome, while something is efficient when it provides the best possible outcome with the least waste of resources.
Something can be effective but not efficient.
Mary´s work is effective because it delivers the best cakes, but inefficient since three cakes get wasted.
