Answer:
<h3>Often create a favorable "climate for investment."</h3>
Explanation:
Conflict theorists contends that multinational corporations incline towards developing countries because these countries often create a favorable "climate for investment." A number of factors attribute these MNC's attraction towards the developing nations.
The weak economic, financial, and socio-political conditions of these countries prompts large MNcs to establish their factories and industries in developing countries as there is lack of proper governmental intervention and strong trade unions.
The Conflict theorists also argue that developing nations have high chances of being exploited by large corporations while maximizing their profits. The availability of large number of cheap labor in these nations is another influencing factor which attracts MNCs to establish factories in these countries.
Ummmm...maybe if you are traveling.
A secular ruler is one that is not guided by any particular form of religion. These 3 events were part of a gradual process that resulted in rulers adopting secularism.
- <u>Peace of Augsburg:</u> Signed in 1555, made it possible for rulers of the Holy Roman Empire to choose between Protestantism or Catholicism as their choice of belief.
- <u>Edict of Nantes:</u> Signed in 1598, granted the Protestants of France rights in the nation. Before this event, Protestants of France were considered as heretics.
- <u>The Peace of Westphalia:</u> Series of peace treaties signed in 1648 that ended the Religious Wars in Europe.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
I think Jim Braddock's winning streak inspired people so much because he is a good example of endurance, perseveration, and faith when difficult moments make people surrender. In his case, he never surrendered and worked hard to sustain his family during the difficult years of the Great Depression.
Those years of the Great Depression were tough ones. After the US stock market crash of October 219, 1929, millions of Americans lost their jobs, companies broke, and banks went into bankruptcy.
Braddock was a boxer that returned to the ring in 1935, after struggling during those difficult years, and won the championship.
His story is so inspirational even now because is an example of perseveration and endurance under difficult times. It is a history of how a man can overcome adversity if he is committed to doing what he needs to do in order to get what he wants, keeping the faith, and never, ever surrender.
Answer:
Explanation:
racial inequality is not necessarily the same thing as racism, though the two do often go hand in hand. Perhaps it would be fair to say that racism is defined by a prejudice towards a group of people based on their race or ethnicity, and racial inequality is the result of that prejudice. For example, while it would be hard to point towards the racism of any one individual to account for the disparity between wealth in white families, and wealth in black families, it is nevertheless certainly an example of racial inequality. The fact that average black people have less money than white people is very plainly a result of lack of opportunity.
After all, we know quite plainly that while western culture (particularly the United States) values the “pull yourself up by the bootstraps narrative”, it is ultimately usually generational wealth that wins the day.
The racial inequality, in this case, is a result of the fact that African Americans started as slaves in this country, and then suffered through Jim Crowe laws, and other circumstance that contributed to a difficulty in establishing a foothold in prosperous circumstance.
It is important to note that situations of racial inequality do not necessarily pertain to every member of a given race. For example, not all African Americans struggle economically, and not all Caucasians prosper financially. In fact, there are countless examples of each case where the exact opposite is true. When people refer to racial inequality, they are talking about patterns that all too often manifest themselves in our society.
