Answer:
After realizing a trial with green and red circles, where the participants had to find a correct target in order to obtain a reward, Zachary Rooper and his team announced that the attention of adolescents is related to rewarding information.
<em>Once the teenage brain has linked a behavior to that reward, it continues to seek the reward again and again. That’s why teens are likely to opt for the reward of social media when they should be studying. Or why they respond to texts while driving.
</em>
Explanation:
This evidence cannot be sufficient to support his statement that teenage brains are constantly seeking to reward. Teenage distractions and lack of attention could be related to their studying habits and their interests, not with the rewards they are expecting from social media websites. Although the rewarding system can motivate middle school and high school students, it should not be related to another habit in their life. It's true that many parents reward their children for achieving good results at school, but their concentration is also related to their personality, study habits, etc.
Therefore, Rooper's statement could be partially applied to the teenage population, but it shouldn't determine their behavior, as some of these behaviors are related to their age and the essential period of their development.
Answer:
a) is.
Explanation:
Just try out the options!
He are my brother does not sound right. Are would only work if there is a second person involved.
He am my brother is not correct. Nothing could make this sentence work.
I'm not sure but I'm going to guess that 'wete' is supposed to be were. In either case, this isn't right.
So it's is. Hope this was helpful!
Answer:
The central idea of the text by James Kuzner is that the very idea of "love at first sight" is possible, depending on the persons involved. Though most people may find it impossible or even improbable for love to happen in such short notice, Kuzner seems to imply that it is indeed possible.
Explanation:
James Kuzner's informational text <em>Should We Scoff at the Idea of Love at First Sight?</em> details the two contrasting yet dominating ideas of <em>"love at first sight"</em>. In his essay, he presents an argument of how both sides of the argument can be approached, but at the same time, provide a compelling approach to the idea.
The whole paper details how most people seem to denounce the theory of falling in love at first sight, or even having a connection in a short time. But while this idea may also seem impossible or even illogical, Shakespeare is proof that some people do have the connection even in such a short time of their meeting. So, while most people may not believe in the possibility of love, Shakespeare's "Romeo and Ju l iet" is proof that it is indeed possible. It all depends on the persons involved, even though there may be times when there's a conflict between love and infatuation, or even lust. Whether it be scientific experiments or surveys, there is a slight possibility that it is indeed possible for such occurrence.
