From these details, what can you conclude about The voter sovereignty and personal freedoms in the Republic of the Sudan

Social Studies

2 answers:

elena-14-01-66 [18.8K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

From the given details, it can be concluded about the voters sovereignty and personal freedoms in the Republic of Sudan that the voters do not have political nor religious freedom.

Explanation:

As stated in the details given, the Republic of Sudan does have a legislative system but most of its members are chosen by appointment and are not elected by the people of Sudan.
The administration of the Republic of Sudan works according to the Islamic law (Shariya). Hence, the citizens of Sudan do not have the liberty to practice the religion of their choice.

madam [21]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

There no freedoms that are personal or relious freedoms

Explanation:

i search up in ss text book

You might be interested in

Which of the following are characteristics of soft money?

pychu [463]

Answer:

b. i, and ii only

Explanation:

Soft money is the term for lightly regulated money transactions and financial campaigns. It presents the financial donation which was given to the party, but not for the direct promotion of a certain political candidate. Other than that, the reason for the user can be any that will result in raising the votes.

One of the characteristics of soft money is that it is unregulated and without many restrictions. It is different from the hard money, given for the direct promotion and advertising of the candidate.

4 0

3 years ago

Where is the red sea

JulsSmile [24]

Answer:

it's located between Africa and Asia.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Which city features a medieval astronomical clock?

Len [333]