Answer:
Earlier? This is just a hypothetical question that can be properly answered only by historians. But let´s try.
If the war on the German-Russian front had continued in 1917, at least it can be said that the German army could not have sent many divisions to the Western Front after the signature of the peace of Brest-Litovsk that got Russia out of the war. Those armies would have to continue to be tied in the Eastern Front. Even after the Russian withdrawal from the conflict, the Allies won the war thanks to the United States´ joining the Allied camp in 1917. The American involvement tipped the balance in favor of the Allies and in the end, the evaporation of the Eastern Front didn´t have a decisive impact on the final outcome of WWI.
Explanation:
The reason for this is that Romans were at the time a very highly developed civilization while the Huns, together with other tribes with which the Romans have dealt with in previous decades, were mostly nomads who did not have permament and grand settlements such as Rome at the time for example. For that reason, this might have made historians like Ammianus be inclined to think that Huns were savage brutes without the capability to think.
Answer: definitely.
Explanation: people on social media can basically say anything they want. and people have very strong feelings when it comes to politics. so others that go on social media can be easily persuaded to vote or even think a certain way, buy believing what they see/read.
-——————-
Huh? I apologize what do you mean-
-——————-
Edit: Haha I get it now! Ty, Same to you <3
