Answer:
Explanation:
application form and any fees
One way to protect against a security threat to a computer system is to Avoid external links with inconsistent URLs.
<h3>What is malware?</h3>
Malware is any programme that is purposely designed to disrupt a computer, server, client, or computer network, leak private information, obtain unauthorised access to information or systems, deny users access to information, or otherwise interfere with the user's computer security and privacy.
One way to protect against a security threat to a computer system is to Avoid external links with inconsistent URLs. The reason for this is that such links may contain malware or spyware.
Learn more about Malware:
brainly.com/question/14276107
#SPJ1
Spam refers to large unsolicited email irregardless of the recipients views on the matter
Answer:
True
Explanation:
Most of the organization suffers from InfoObesity, i.e., too much data without the proper holding structure for this.
Business intelligence abbreviated as BI plays a major role in the determining the planning strategies of an organizations and serves multiple purposes which includes measurement of performance towards business objectives, quantitative analysis, data reporting and sharing, etc.
BI systems helps in eliminating InfoObesity, by manging the data and filtration of the data with proper data structure to serve specific purposes.
Answer:Technology law scholars have recently started to consider the theories of affordance and technological mediation, imported from the fields of psychology, human-computer interaction (HCI), and science and technology studies (STS). These theories have been used both as a means of explaining how the law has developed, and more recently in attempts to cast the law per se as an affordance. This exploratory paper summarises the two theories, before considering these applications from a critical perspective, noting certain deficiencies with respect to potential normative application and definitional clarity, respectively. It then posits that in applying them in the legal context we should seek to retain the relational user-artefact structure around which they were originally conceived, with the law cast as the user of the artefact, from which it seeks certain features or outcomes. This approach is effective for three reasons. Firstly, it acknowledges the power imbalance between law and architecture, where the former is manifestly subject to the decisions, made by designers, which mediate and transform the substance of the legal norms they instantiate in technological artefacts. Secondly, from an analytical perspective, it can help avoid some of the conceptual and definitional problems evident in the nascent legal literature on affordance. Lastly, approaching designers on their own terms can foster better critical evaluation of their activities during the design process, potentially leading to more effective ‘compliance by design’ where the course of the law’s mediation by technological artefacts can be better anticipated and guided by legislators, regulators, and legal practitioners.
Keywords
Affordance, technological mediation, postphenomenology, legal theory, compliance by design, legal design
