Answer and Explanation:
Risk and return are equal companions if we invest in a market with a higher risk that's mean this type of market provides a higher return.
If Investors invest their whole money in the high-risk market for there high return, may they get a huge loss.
So, The exposure must be balanced by investments in diversified markets with different risk weights.
Answer:
First option will be recommended.
Explanation:
To determine which option to be taken, we calculate the net present value each option generates. The option generating higher NPV should be recommended.
- Net present value of first option = Lump sum receipt = $150,000.
- Net present value of second option will be found by discounting cash flows at investing rate 12% and calculated as followed:
+ Present value of 20 equal annual payment of $14,000 + Present value of $60,000 paid in 20 years = (14,000/12%) x [ 1 - 1.12^(-20)] + 60,000/1.12^20 = $110,792.
As net present value of the first option is higher than the second option, first option will be recommended.
Answer:
For paint line to must produce the 4950 gallons of beige paint, it needs total of 5174.1 Kg. It accounts for the factors which are mentioned in the question . Explanation for this is attached in the image.
Explanation:
Explanation is in the attached image.
Answer:
$12,500
Explanation:
Calculation for the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017
Since we were told that In 2016, Joshua gave the amount of $12,500 to his son in which in the same year which was 2017, the XYZ shares are worth the amount of $25,000 which means that the total amount removed from Joshua’s estate in 2017 will be $12,500 ($25,000-$12,500).
Answer:
Morally, how about we start with business morals. Extensively business morals spin around progressively the estimation of the business to investors or partners (contingent upon the type of private enterprise). In the event that redistributing work diminishes costs and converts into expanded benefits for the organization, that is sufficient to consider it in accordance with the all-encompassing order of the business whether or not there is a decrease in cost for the buyer.
Is it morally wrong to use innovative advances to build creation productivity when request in a market is generally inelastic? Cultivating used to be 40% of American employments. Presently it's generally 2% but then out creation has developed.
Long haul the pulverization of a class of business is regularly counterbalanced by the formation of another classification the requires increasingly psychological assets. Actually, whole new enterprises can be made. So it is additionally not so much exact to restrict your view to simply the individuals who are dislodged from their occupations. It is completely conceivable that the net impact on the economy is sure.
Be that as it may, again morals are increasingly emotional and have to do with the type of private enterprise to which one buys in, political way of thinking, and perspective on social duty of business.
