Answer:
Neurosciences contribute to understanding the mental processes that thinking develops, for example, how we perceive, act, learn and remember.
Explanation:
Neuroscience is responsible for the study of the Nervous System from neuronal functioning to behavior. It implies the understanding of the normal brain functioning, it favors the knowledge and understanding of neurobiological abnormalities that cause mental and neurological disorders. The main purpose of Neurosciences is to understand how the brain produces the marked individuality of human action. It is to provide explanations of behavior in terms of brain activities, to explain how millions of individual nerve cells in the brain act to produce behavior and how, in turn, these cells are influenced by the environment, including the behavior of other individuals. It increases our understanding of normal functions as well as psychological dysfunctions and consequently, more effective methods of treatment of mental illnesses emerge that together raise the quality of life of the human being.
Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.
Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.
Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.
Hello There!
<span>The formation of associations between two stimuli, which occur sequentially in time, is referred to as classical conditioning.
</span>
Hope This Helps You!
Good Luck :)
- Hannah ❤
Answer:
Beacuse muhammad came back to Mecca and conquered Mecca
Explanation:
Explanation:
It ls something that people can't live without. Love keeps us striving to keep going and/or finding something new.
