Answer:
The theoretical paradigm the sociologist using is social-conflict paradigm
Explanation:
The conflict theory argues that the division of society into bourgeois and working class generates conflicts due to their nature. Thus, the work states that there will always be splits if this system remains in society. So, taking this into account, we can assess the claim as true, since capitalism has taken root in much of Western society. For Marx, the conflict is a direct result of the social division by power and wealth.
The bourgeois have in their hands the control of manufacture and production of legal and political entities. Thus, the direct result would be the exploitation of the working class. However, the latter would always be at the mercy of the will and impositions of the ruling class.
Answer:
authoritarian
Explanation:
Authoritarian regime: The term authoritarian regime is defined as a phenomenon in which an individual who is considered as a ruling authority is supposed to maintain power via a combination of different appeals towards a traditional legitimacy, repression and patron-client ties, that is being carried out through a bound consisting the ruling person or the authority by personal loyalties.
In the question above, the given statement signifies the authoritarian regime.
The Webster–Hayne debate<span> was a famous debate in the </span>United States<span> between </span>Senator Daniel Webster<span> of </span>Massachusetts<span> and Senator </span>Robert Y. Hayne<span> of </span>South Carolina<span> that took place on January 19–27, 1830 on the topic of </span>protectionist tariffs<span>.</span>
