Yes indeed! The Articles were submitted to the states for ratification in the midst of war with Great Britain.
The eastern border of Europe is often considered to be the countries of the former Soviet Union which are often referred to as the Eastern Bloc. These countries include Russia, Poland, the Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia, and Lithuania. Ultimately the border of Europe blends into Asia in Russia and Turkey which have served as historical bridges between Europe and the Asian region which continues today.
The part of the brain that is important for not only storage
but also recall of the new long-term memories is the hippocampus which is a part of the
limbic system of the brain. The limbic
system itself is really important as it supports not only long-term memory but
also things like emotion, motivation and behavior.
Affirmative action refers to a hiring or admissions strategy that offers traditionally disadvantaged groups particular treatment in order to reduce the current impacts of past discrimination.
Affirmative action is a set of policies, programs, and practices that give minorities and women limited preferences in job hiring, admission to higher education institutions, the awarding of government contracts, and other social benefits. It was first implemented by the government as a response to the negative effects of long-standing discrimination against such groups.
Age, gender, ethnic origin, and race are the traditional factors for affirmative action. President Lyndon Johnson's administration (1963–1969) launched affirmative action in an effort to increase possibilities for African Americans as civil rights laws eliminated the justifications for discrimination.
To learn more about affirmative action, visit the link below:
brainly.com/question/28025441
#SPJ4
Answer:Sociological research is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to terrorism and violent crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and in public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” or “soft” on crime. Tough and soft are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories cannot be resolved using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
In fact policy debates over terrorism and crime seem especially susceptible to the various forms of specious, unscientific reasoning described later in this chapter. The story of the isolated individual, whose specific act of violence becomes the basis for the belief that the criminal justice system as a whole has failed, illustrates several qualities of unscientific thinking: knowledge based on casual observation, knowledge based on over-generalization, and knowledge based on selective evidence. The sociological approach to policy questions is essentially different since it focuses on examining the effectiveness of different social control strategies for addressing different types of violent behaviour and the different types of risk to public safety. Thus, from a sociological point of view, it is crucial to think systematically about who commits violent acts and why.
Although moral claims and opinions are of interest to sociologists, sociological researchers use empirical evidence (that is, evidence corroborated by direct experience and/or observation) combined with the scientific method to deliver sound sociological research. A truly scientific sociological study of the social causes that lead to terrorist or criminal violence would involve a sequence of prescribed steps: defining a specific research question that can be answered through empirical observation; gathering information and resources through detailed observation; forming a hypothesis; testing the hypothesis in a reproducible manner; analyzing and drawing conclusions from the data; publishing the results; and anticipating further development when future researchers respond to and re-examine the findings.
Explanation: The major factors responsible for these experimentations had earlier being revealed and portrayed.
