Answer:Sorry I didn’t write this in the comment but it didn’t let me but
Explanation:so some questions I would like to meet..? Lol
He believed lasting peace would provide national self discremination establish principles
Answer:
Option a (unintended side-effects) is the right alternative.
Explanation:
- A cost, as well as benefit occasioned by such a production company that would not be economically accumulated rather than started receiving by this same producer, seems to be an environmental problem.
- An externality could be either favorable or unfavorable and therefore can occur whether from the development or use of a particular product. The expenses and rewards may be confidential to a person or an organization, or social, which means that society as a whole should be influenced.
Some other options are given aren't connected to the conclusions reached. So, the obvious response here is just the right one.
The answer is rule-governed behavior. This is quite a bit of human conduct depends on rules we gain from others or make ourselves. For instance, your great companion may abstain from touching a red burner on a stove since somebody disclosed to her she would get copied on the off chance that she did. That is, she could have learned and taken after an administer about touching red burners.
Answer:
- <em>At an exchange rate of 1.05 euro per dollar the cost of a latté would be the same in the euro area as it did in the United States.</em>
<em></em>
Explanation:
The contidion is that the two prices are equal:
- <em>exchange rate </em>× $2.8 = Euros 2.93
Solve for the <em>exchange rate</em>:
- <em>exchange rate</em> = Euros2.93/$2.80 = Euro 1.05/$
Thus, at an<em> exchange rate</em> of 1.05 euro per dollar <em>the cost of a latté would be the same in the euro area as it did in the United States.</em>
