Two landmark decisions by the U.S. Supreme Court served to confirm the inferred constitutional authority for judicial review in the United States: In 1796, Hylton v. United States was the first case decided by the Supreme Court involving a direct challenge to the constitutionality of an act of Congress, the Carriage Act of 1794 which imposed a "carriage tax".[2]
The Court engaged in the process of judicial review by examining the
plaintiff's claim that the carriage tax was unconstitutional. After
review, the Supreme Court decided the Carriage Act was not
unconstitutional. In 1803, Marbury v. Madison[3]
was the first Supreme Court case where the Court asserted its authority
for judicial review to strike down a law as unconstitutional. At the
end of his opinion in this decision,[4]
Chief Justice John Marshall maintained that the Supreme Court's
responsibility to overturn unconstitutional legislation was a necessary
consequence of their sworn oath of office to uphold the Constitution as
instructed in Article Six of the Constitution.
Answer:
The correct answer is Lauren was the initiator and Tom was the decision maker.
Explanation:
<span>They moved the fighting to the Southern colonies because
they believed that they would help them in the war. Most of the colonists in the area were Tories
or those loyal to the Crown. In
addition, the large number of slaves made the British believe that this would
be to their advantage.</span>
The concept of <u>Ethical Relativism</u> varies from society to society and deals with the perception of what constitutes right from wrong within that society.
Explanation:
The <u>Theory of Ethical Relativism</u> states that moral objectives are not true and also ,their is no absolute truth in ethics,what is morally wrong and right depends upon the society in which we live and it varies from the perception of one society to another .
<u>Perception</u> pertain to the perspective/point of view of an individual or a society.
