Answer:
The development of antibiotics and immunizations.
Explanation:
Answer: D) Discussing intellectual(...)collaboration is forming.
Explanation: It is essential to address some of the negative aspects associated with the increase in scientific collaboration, particularly unjustified hyperauthorities and the contradiction between accrediting systems and the valuation of individual merits of products that are the result of cooperative practices. In this sense, it is important to analyze the value of the signatures in the publications and their use, developing a Sociology of the attribution of scientific merit, since it is computed differently according to the scientific areas or branches; as well as deepening the study of the conflict that arises from the growth of the collective mode of knowledge production and prevalence in relation to the professional promotion of individual rewards and recognition.
The correct answer would be Omission.
Indeed, if the person who failed to act had the legal duties to do it (like a police officer or a doctor). This is considered a crime of omission since there was <em>mens rea</em> (guilty mind in Latin); meaning that the offender knew that failure to act despite his established duty would result in injury to the other party.
Answer:
Generalizing from vivid cases
Explanation:
Generalization is a process in which the stimuli respond in the same way to the different but same stimuli.
For instance, the dog salivates to the tune of the bell and due to loudness same thing happened. Generalization is a term that is particularly related to generalization at the whole level.
Thus here Ervin's conclusion best illustrates that danger of the generalizing from vivid cases.
