Answer: we need a,b,c,d to find out
Explanation: didn’t help
Based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
This is because, before the agreed date of 20th August, X withdrew her acceptance and sent it by post and also made a call to Y which informed him of her current stance.
<h3>What is a Contract?</h3>
This refers to the legally binding agreement that exists between two or more people about the terms of something.
Hence, we can see that based on the given scenario, it can be concluded that a legally binding contract was concluded between X and Y.
Notwithstanding the arrival of the postal letter of acceptance, this is considered void as there has been a change of terms that have been clearly communicated to the other party.
Read more about contract here:
brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ1
Double jeopardy- the right to avoid being tried twice
Just-compensation - the right to be paid for property by the government
Due-process - the right to the same treatment and rules as everyone
Grand-jury - the right to indictment before trial for a capital crime
Self-incrimination - the right to avoid confessing to a crime