1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Katen [24]
3 years ago
14

Consider and explain what this type of research might mean for the future?

Law
1 answer:
Lyrx [107]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

It will help develop the lives of citizens

You might be interested in
What is the difference between federal parliament republic and federal constitutional republic?
sveta [45]
The difference between these two is federal parliament republic refers to a federation of states with a republican form of government that is, more or less, dependent upon the confidence of parliaments at both the national and sub-national levels and federal constitutional republic refers to both a national government and governments of the 50 states.
4 0
3 years ago
Which of the following courses of action can Congress take if the Supreme Court declares a law to be unconstitutional?
Julli [10]
It’s B) Congress can appeal the decision in a federal court.
3 0
3 years ago
if a supreme court justice believes that the constitution should be interpreted exactly as written, rather than examined in the
frosja888 [35]

Answer:

judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Question 40(Multiple Choice Worth 2 points)
Galina-37 [17]

Answer:

Judicial independence is important because it guarantees that judges are free to decide honestly and impartially, in accordance with the law and evidence, without concern or fear of interference, control, or improper influence from anyone.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Trial practice is dramatically different in Britain. The lawyers for the two sides, called solicitors, do not go into court. Cou
Burka [1]

Answer:

The British approach appears to be more effective and even more efficient.

Explanation:

The British approach eliminates the tendency of lawyers to coach the witnesses to produce required answers.  This means that using the British approach, witnesses are not properly prepared with correctly rehearsed answers to questions.  The discovery of the case by both lawyers happens in the courtroom and not at a pretrial stage.  With the British approach, courtroom lawyers are responsible for conducting the opening statement, direct examination of witnesses, closing statement, and cross-examination of witnesses.

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • If the free speech aspect of the First Amendment were up for ratification today,do you think it would pass in the same form as i
    6·1 answer
  • Your country has just experienced a difficult Civil War in which many resources was were destroyed and many citizens in lost the
    11·2 answers
  • Is factual causation and legal causation mean the same thing? true or false
    15·2 answers
  • You are following a bus or other large vehicle and are approaching an
    11·1 answer
  • Who decides the times places and manner of elections for congress
    14·1 answer
  • Should the government regulate the media and interest groups ?
    15·1 answer
  • What states can I legally own a pet bat?
    9·2 answers
  • Define proto<br>please help​
    15·2 answers
  • Plssssssssssssssssss help
    8·2 answers
  • Do you think it's a good idea for the federal government to regulate the information that is shared over social media based on t
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!