1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Arlecino [84]
3 years ago
5

After her mother says, "No, you may not eat any cookies" Sandra takes some cookies from the cookie jar and eats them when her mo

ther isn't looking. Later, she feels bad because she knows this was not a good thing to do. Sandra's attitude indicates that her:________.
a. id is in control.
b. ability to delay gratification is strong.
c. logic includes the concept of stagnation.
d. super ego is reasonably well developed.
Social Studies
1 answer:
kap26 [50]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

d. super ego is reasonably well developed.

Explanation:

human brain has three agent i-e ego, id and superego. Superego is agent which make people conscience and guide toward good acts. It leads to protectionist and morality. This agent make people feel guilt after bad things doing. Same here Sandra feel guilt after eating cookies without her mother permission shows that her superego is well established and responded after bad doings.

You might be interested in
Why did the Hawaiian parliament shifted in favor of U.S. annexation?
loris [4]

<span><span>In the early weeks of the administration of President Benjamin Harrison (1889-1893), the U.S. minister to Hawaii, Henry Carter, drafted a free-trade treaty with Hawaii.  The treaty intended to transform the island nation into an American protectorate:  the United States would guarantee Hawaii’s independence at the price of American veto power over treaties Hawaii negotiated with other countries and American military authority over internal or external threats.  When a rebellion broke out in July 1889, Harrison ordered 70 marines to land and restore order in Hawaii, and thereafter stationed an American naval vessel off the Hawaiian coast.  The next year, the McKinley Tariff removed the trade advantage of Hawaii sugar producers, who relied overwhelmingly on American markets, by putting sugar on the duty-free list and granting a bounty to American sugar growers. The Hawaiian economy dropped into a depression, and as a result, white sugar growers favored establishment of an American protectorate or outright annexation.  Their plans were thwarted when Queen Liliuokalani, supported by Hawaiian nationalists, ascended the throne in January 1891.</span><span>The February 1892 elections in Hawaii resulted in a virtual deadlock between three parties.  Soon afterward, the new U.S. minister, John L. Stevens, requested instructions on how to react should rebels, who had consulted with him, overthrow the monarchy to establish a republic.  In May, Lorrin Thurston, a Hawaiian legislator and member of the secret Annexation Club, arrived in Washington, D.C., to lobby the Harrison administration to support a republican revolution.  He met with Secretary of State James Blaine and Navy Secretary Benjamin Tracy, but was not allowed to see the president.  In his final annual message to Congress in December 1892, Harrison endorsed development of the Pearl Harbor naval base and the laying of a telegraph cable to Hawaii.</span><span>The Hawaiian cabinet resigned on January 12, 1893.  Two days later, the queen announced a new constitution reasserting monarchical powers, and the Annexation Club moved to create a provisional government.  On January 16, Stevens ordered the 165-man U.S.S. Boston to land, ostensibly to protect the American mission.  The next day the rebels proclaimed a republic headed by Judge Stanford Dole, a wealthy planter.  The strategic placement of the American troops proved instrumental in preventing the royal forces from effectively responding to the coup.  On his own authority, Stevens recognized the new Hawaiian government, proclaimed it an American protectorate, and ordered the American flag flown on all government buildings. </span><span>Less than a month later, the new Hawaiian government had drafted and passed an annexation treaty, which it sent to the outgoing Harrison administration. After receiving assurances from U.S. ministers in France, Great Britain, and Russia that those nations would not protest, the Harrison administration signed the annexation treaty on February 14 and forwarded it to the Senate.  Harrison warned that annexation would prevent Hawaii from falling under the control of another great power, which would threaten American interests and security.  However, there was not enough support in the outgoing Republican-controlled Senate for the two-thirds vote required for ratification, and the incoming Democratic Senate would certainly defeat it. </span><span>On March 9, the new president, Democrat Grover Cleveland, withdrew the treaty and appointed a committee to investigate American involvement in the bloodless Hawaiian coup.  The report, released on July 25, harshly criticized Stevens’s role in the rebellion, argued that most native Hawaiians did not favor annexation, and suggested that the annexationists were acting out of economic self-interest.  The Cleveland administration requested that Dole and the provisional government abdicate, and that the queen grant them amnesty and recognize their acts while in office.  Both sides resisted, and in his December 1893 message to Congress, Cleveland handed the dilemma to them.  After extensive hearings, and the rejection of various proposals, Congress decided to leave the situation as it existed with the minority government in power and Hawaii independent.</span><span>In March 1897, William McKinley, the new Republican president, met with his advisors to discuss whether it was preferable to annex Hawaii by treaty or congressional resolution.  In April, the Hawaiian minister to the U.S. officially requested that the McKinley administration begin negotiations on an annexation treaty.  Around the same time, the Republican-controlled Senate was preparing to prohibit Hawaiian sugar from the American market.  On June 16, President McKinley sent an annexation treaty to the Senate, stating that the annexation of Hawaii by the United States was only a matter of time.  Although most Republicans supported the treaty, Southern Democrats looked upon it with disfavor for reasons of economics (sugar interests</span><span>Robert C. Kennedy</span></span>
7 0
3 years ago
A social scientist is interested in studying if happiness (very happy, somewhat happy, a little happy, or not happy) is associat
Alisiya [41]

The answer is sibling status. The more naturally explanatory variable is the sibling status.

 

 

EXPLANATION

An explanatory variable is basically a part of the independent variable. The explanatory variable is a kind of independent variable. The term is similar to one another because the explanatory variable is a part of the independent variable. The term independent means that that variable is not affected by any other variables, while the explanatory variable means that a variable can’t be decided for certain if it’s independent or not.

 

The line between the explanatory variable and the independent variable is not really that important. Except if you do advance research that has a lot of variables, then it may be important because the variables are interacting with each other. The differences between the explanatory variable and the independent variables are important in clinical research. But in most cases, specifically in statistics, the independent variable and explanatory variable are basically the same.

 

Here is an example to understand the independent variable and explanatory variable. Let’s say there are two variables that can explain the cause of weight gain, which are soda and fast food. Most people might think that soda and fast food are both independent of each other, but actually, they are not really independent of each other.  

It has been associated that if you eat fast food, then you must drink soda as a compliment. If you buy soda, then there will be a lot of fast food options around you, like the burger, hot dogs, or even nachos. Even though soda and fast food are not independent of each other, they still explain the effect of weight gain. Therefore, fast food and soda are explanatory variables because they can explain the weight gain.

LEARN MORE

If you’re interested in learning more about this topic, we recommend you to also take a look at the following questions:

Statistical studies: brainly.com/question/9004850

The nature of relationship between variables: brainly.com/question/6887561

KEYWORD: explanatory variable, research, independent variable

Subject: Social Studies

Class: College

Subchapter: Explanatory variable

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
describe the significance of pearl's dress. what visible connection does pearl's garb acknowledge? what is hester trying to say
11Alexandr11 [23.1K]

Answer: Pearl's Garb is best.

Explanation: This is considered as one of a modelling classic aimed at bringing out beauty and shape of the user (model). Hester believes pearl can be more popular and showcase class among it's contemporaries.

3 0
4 years ago
Internationally, the oligopoly model exists in _________ nations that allow written agreements to set market price and market sh
Karolina [17]

The oligopoly model exists in "many" nations that allow written agreements to set market price and market share.

In an oligopoly, a group of firms (usually two or more) controls the market. However, no single company can keep the others from welding significant influence over the industry, and they each may sell products that are slightly different then other.

Prices in oligopoly market are moderate because of the presence of competition. When one company sets a price, others will respond in fashion to remain competitive.

Oligopoly is when a small number of relatively large companies produce similar, but slightly different goods.

To learn more about  Oligopoly, here

brainly.com/question/15414864

#SPJ4

6 0
2 years ago
A written statement of a judge who disagrees with the courts majority decision
Law Incorporation [45]

Answer:

A dissenting opinion

Explanation: When someone disagrees with a judge it is called a dissenting opinion

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Explain who god is to the christian using at least three characteristics of god. why are the characteristics of god so important
    5·1 answer
  • When assessing personality, many psychologists take the eclectic view, which means they ________.?
    12·2 answers
  • Arguments used against socialism
    11·2 answers
  • Public bills apply to the_____.private bills apply to____
    5·2 answers
  • This describes a species which makes up a large percentage of an ecosystem.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of the following statements about protests is false? Even the biggest protests involve only a tiny portion of the public.
    7·1 answer
  • Kung hindi ko sana inuna ang pag sa cellphone hindi sana ako iniwan nila nanay saad nito habang umiiyak dahil ramdam na nito ang
    5·1 answer
  • The President of the United States is Commander-in-Chief of the nation’s Armed Forces. In a similar way, each state governor is
    14·2 answers
  • Class for biology fasttly join link<br>hcu-orfr-qcs​
    6·1 answer
  • What electrical science term did benjamin franklin coin? watt
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!