Answer:
Foodstuffs Have Been Invented
Have you ever wondered where all the new foods on the grocery store shelves come from? Every year, hundreds of new foods are developed, each one the result of the efforts of an inventor. Three popular foods that originated in North America are potato chips, chewing gum, and peanut butter.
Potato chips are now Canada's most popular snack. The average Canadian eats 4.5 kilograms of potato chips per year. Accidental inventions do happen. An expanding potato. George Crumb, a chef, invented the chip 150 years ago. One night, a restaurant patron requested thinner potatoes, so George fried them. Soak them in oil. The customer loved them, and the idea took off. But it wasn't until a potato peeling. A machine could manufacture and distribute potato chips across North America.
Our food is constantly evolving thanks to inventors who are always coming up with new ideas. Enjoy your potato chip, chew your gum and spread your peanut butter! Enjoy! Maybe one day you'll invent your own food.
Explanation:
Here is a little help with getting you started.
Let's write complete sentences using the given words:
1. Van Gogh's paintings are almost as expensive as the work of Picasso.
2. We did not know the Recycled Orchestra until we watched the video online yesterday.
For the first sentence, we can see that the purpose is to compare the work of two painters, Van Gogh and Picasso. That is why we use the structure "as ... as". We must place the adjective "expensive" in the middle: "almost as expensive as".
For the second sentence, we do not need to add anything. However, because of the word "yesterday", we know the sentence refers to something that happened in the past. Thus, we use the Simple Past tense for the verbs: not know - did not know; watch - watched.
In conclusion, all we need to do is read the words to grasp what the purpose of each sentence is and then add or change whatever is necessary to form a complete sentence.
Learn more about the Simple Past tense here:
brainly.com/question/14025107?referrer=searchResults
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
what?? wdym who is jerome what is he from why r u asking
Explanation:
I believe the correct answer is the second choice: <span>We walked through the Red Oak Nature Center today; it was surprising how many bicyclists were there.
</span>
