Answer:
The cost of the units completed and transferred out of the department was $825,000.
Explanation:
The costs per equivalent unit for the month were $2.00 for materials and $3.50 for conversion costs.
= 150,000 units × ($2.00 + $3.50) = $825,000.
Answer:
The businesses paid $24 billion in entrepreneurial ability. This value comes from subtracting the wages, rent and interest from the total amount of businesses' purchase. In this case 170 - 88 - 24 - 34 = 24.
Explanation:
This value can be understood as goodwill that households are recognized for their ideas and can bring a future return to the businesses. The businesses had assessed the future stream of cash the household could bring and, basing our guess on businesses behaving rationally, and they found that 170 was an amount that will recognize these future opportunities
To solve for the cost of goods sold (COGS):
COGS = Net sales - gross profit
COGS = $812,000 - $355,000
COGS = $457,000
The cost of doors sold is the costs that are used for production of the goods the company sells. It includes materials used for creating the product and labor.
Answer:
The correct option is "<em>d." Characteristics that would make a misstatement material include: The misstatement makes it probable that the judgment of a reasonable person relying on the information would have been changed or influenced by the omission or misstatement.</em>
Explanation:
<em>A misstatement </em>is a false or incorrect statement. So a material misstatement is a significant statement that is false or incorrect. In the context of a financial audit, a material misstatement is untrue information in a financial statement that could affect the financial decisions of one who relies on the statement.
Answer:
The performance problem to minor burns will be mainly psychological.
Explanation:
The staff involved will most likely exhibit a reduction in speed at which he or she executed the task which led to the burn.
If the personnel is in a chain of production where their own activity feeds others, it may translate to the increase in the time taken to achieve results.
One solution to this is to critically examine the production process and eliminate the cause of the accident if any.
If the cause of the incident was as a result of carelessness on the part of the staff, then he or she might have to be rescheduled to another department or unit where their current mindset will not stall the overall performance of the team/production line.
Cheers!
