Answer:
B
Explanation:
I believe it would be B, since its talking about how his love his being taken from him, and he is now alone.
It is a very very good idea and if they made more schools say like colleges free then i think more people would go to school i hope i helped and undersud it right
Answer:
C. Independence
Explanation:
A prefix can be defined as a morpheme such as in, un, semi, pre, con, re, etc., that are added to the beginning of a word so as to modify or change its meaning.
When the prefix "in" is added to the word dependence it becomes independence which simply means that the individual or thing is free and not dependent on another for anything. Simply stated, independence connotes freedom and liberty.
Answer:
The speaker's perspective is that of a loving father, happy to entertain and play around with her daughters. He expressed his caring and endless love for them throughout the whole poem.
Explanation:
The poem "The Children's Hour" is written by Henry Wadsworth Longfellow about a father and his daughters' relationship. The poem presents a caring and deeply emotional love a father has for his daughters.
The speaker in the poem is an unnamed man, probably the father of the three girls. He comments about himself as "an old mustache as I am." But through his reaction to his daughters bursting into his room, suggests he is a loving father. This can be inferred from the lines that express his feelings for his daughters-
<em>"voices soft and sweet"</em>
<em>"They almost devour me with kisses"</em>
<em>"And there will I keep you forever".</em>
These three lines from the poem are evidence of the father's/ speaker's love for the three little girls- Alice, Allegra, and Edith.
The correct answer is A. Post hoc ergo propter hoc
Explanation:
In a Post hoc ergo proper hoc fallacy the speaker considers one event is the cause of another because one event follows the other in time. This implies the speaker incorrectly assumes one event to be the cause of another without real evidence. This occurs in the example presented because the speaker thinks Jalessa being a President is the cause that the school was broken into. However, there is no evidence Jalessa is the direct cause of this event and this cannot be concluded based on the fact the incident occurred after Jalessa became the class president.
