Answer:
Probably not, because Alyssa made a mistake about the dog's value, not a mistake about material fact.
Explanation:
When Sierra offered to sell the dog to Allysa, Allysa failed to discuss the ancestry of the puppy. She wrongly believed the dog came from a line of champions.
On finding out the dog is only worth $200, she will not be able to rescind the contract because the onus to ask all relevant questions about the purchase before accepting is on her.
She made the mistake of assuming the dog was worth $800. She made a mistake about the dog's value and not the material fact.
Answer:
Is the proposed action legal?
Explanation:
The very first step in the decision tree (below) was ignored. Disregarding local laws is ignoring the question of legality.
Answer:
The time value of money is used to determine the fair value of the transaction ( B )
Explanation:
If a contract involves a significant financing component the time value of money is used to determine the fair value of the transaction and this is because the time value of money states that the money at hand ( available money ) is worth more than the identical sum of money in the future due to the earning capacity of the money.
therefore a contract involving a significant financing component ( present monetary component ) would have its fair value determined by the time value of money
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": It decreases the size of your principal and decreases the total cost of the loan
.
Explanation:
Down payments are the initial sums debtors pay when requesting a credit. Down payments are usually mandatory but the debtor can offer the sum voluntarily.
<em />
<em>If the sum provided in the down payment is higher than what is requested, the amount of the principal will be lower. If the amount of the principal is lower, the total of the interest paid in the course to the loan will be lower as well, thus, the cost of the loan will be reduced.</em>
