The statement best compares the two passages in that the first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
<h3>What are the comparisons between both the passages?</h3>
The first passage intimations that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by interchanging diverted looks, which allow that this is an open lie.
And in the second passage, we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when the Mother, after finding out what happened, starts propelling her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha interacts.
Therefore, option A is correct.
Learn more about passages, refer:
brainly.com/question/23662376
Beowulf says that he will fight Grendel with his hands because Grendel has no weapon himself. They have no weapon to slay the beast anyway. 9) Consider the description of Grendel's marsh, the lake, and Herot.
Beowulf goes to fight Grendel to help the people of Herot, but more importantly to gain glory for himself. He intends to fight the beast with his bare hands, and he does, and wins by doing so.
plz mark me as brainliest if this helped :)
Answer:
1. navigation
2. keywords
Explanation:
i took the test on PLATO and got it correct.
<span>You see lots of pies in the first course and in the second course, meat and fish pies. To cook a turkey in a pie was not terribly uncommon. The colonists did not have butter and wheat flour to make crusts for pies and tarts. That’s right: No pumpkin pie! Hope this helped. :) <span>
</span></span>
The consensus opinion is that Machu Picchu was built as an estate for the great Inca Pachacuti. It is also considered a pilgrimage site that Incas would take to pay respects to the great Inca leader. The pilgrimage taken to the site is the route now called the Inca Trail.
