<span>a. the shortest possible time to complete an activity.
Crash Time is the shortest possible time it takes to complete a job or activity by expediting everything associated with the job or activity. It's a good example of the time/money trade off in that you can frequently decrease the time something takes by spending more money. So let's look at the choices and see why they're right or wrong.
a. The shortest possible time to complete an activity.
* This pretty much is the same as the definition, so it's the correct choice.
b. The time necessary to complete an activity under abnormal conditions.
* This answer raises the question "What's an abnormal condition?" Does everything go right and things go faster? Does everything go wrong and it's gonna take a long time? In my experience both extremes are "abnormal". So this is a wrong choice.
c. The difference between earliest start time and earliest finish time.
* This answer is lacking the idea of a job or task. Earliest start time of what? So it's a wrong choice.
d. The activity time associated with any management intervention.
* So a phone call from management would be crash time? The boss walking past to see how things are doing? This is a very open ended and ambiguous answer. So it's wrong.</span>
<span>
<span>True.
Risk in investment can be defined as the possibility that the investor may
lose a big portion or all of the initial investment or make very high returns
in a short period. Risk which is often likened to volatility dictates that
the higher the volatility the higher the chances of returns. Speculative
investments such as leveraged ETFs(commodities such as gold, oil, silver),
options, venture capital trusts are considered high risk and often so offer
handsome returns or cost the investor all or even more of their initial
capital. It is however important to note that high risk does not
automatically translate into high returns. The intrinsic value of the
investment vehicle among other factors need to be considered in depth to
determine if the investment is worth the risk</span></span>
<span>Car when parent bought it= 5000$
level when parent bought it =50
Car when I bought it= x$
level when I bought it =200
x=(5000*200) divided by 50
x=5000*4
=20000
Answer for parents car value today = 20000$</span>
Answer:
The correct option here is B) the degree of liquidity in each element.
Explanation:
Money supply can be described as total amount of money , which is present in an economy at a point of time.
Money supply can be classified as M0,M1,M2 etc , where these different money supply's reflects different type of liquidity that each type of money has in the economy. M0, M1 actually consists of narrow money and contain coins and notes, which are in circulation in the economy and these are easily convertible in to cash and they are most liquid elements and same way M2 would be less liquid than M1, and so on.
Answer:
Here answer to the first fill in the blank is money paid and answer for the second fill in the blank is overall sacrifice.
Explanation:
Here Eddie has perceived price as money paid for the purchase of his favorite beverage, he is ready to drive 30 miles for this beverage , just because he is saving a dollar on it, so from the Eddie's point view , driving 30 miles to get the beverage is worth it . But as per the most of the customers , Eddie is making an overall sacrifice by driving 30 miles to get the beverage , just because he is saving dollar on it, so from the most customers point of view , driving 30 miles is not worth it and a lot of sacrifice is being made.
