It should be noted that pursuing multiple market segments at the same time is not the best way to enter new markets. Therefore, it's false.
<h3>What is a market?</h3>
A market simply means the coming together of a buyer and seller for transactions purpose.
In this case, pursuing multiple market segments at the same time is not the best way to enter new markets. One needs to have complete knowledge before entering a market.
Learn more about market on:
brainly.com/question/25754149
Answer:
the correct answer is
If a cost is a common cost of the segments on a segmented income statement, the costshould:A) be allocated to the segments on the basis of segment sales.
Explanation:
hope this helps u!!!
Answer:
you can buy and get stuff in physical form.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer would be option D, Legal Market for a market price that is lower.
Explanation:
If there is a store which sells the goods at the market price even though the government authorities have set the minimum price that can be charged, it means store is selling the product at a price which is higher than the minimum price set by the government, but it doesn't mean that the store owner is doing any illegal trading. This is because the government has set the lower price limit but that ceiling price is non binding. It is not necessary for the market sellers to sell at the price given by government. So they are operating in a legal market for a market price that is lower.
The economic principle of substitution says that when there are two houses in the same neighborhood with the same size, appeal, and utility, the lower-priced one will tend to sell first.
<h3>The economic principle of substitution</h3>
- According to the principle of substitution, the cost of purchasing a substitute that is just as desired tends to establish the upper limit of value, assuming no inopportune delays.
- A shrewd investor would not spend more on an asset that generates income than it would cost to construct or buy an asset of a similar nature.
- According to this theory, the cost of acquiring a comparable substitute property with the same use, design, and revenue determine the maximum value of a property in most cases.
- For instance, why would somebody pay $1,000,000 for a home when they could pay $750,000 for a different but as appealing home in the same neighborhood?
To learn more about the economic principle of substitution refer to:
brainly.com/question/9659517
#SPJ4
