The major difference between Bach’s cello suite no. 6 from 1–5 is that cello suite no. 6 is the " only cello that is notated in the alto and soprano clefs or tenor and treble clefs in recent editions."
Cello suite no. 6 differs from other cello suites 1-5 because it is written in a free technique than other suites 1-5.
It also has additional improvised directions and virtuosic passages.
Cello suite no. 6 is generally considered to be a symphony for solo cello.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that there are many differences between Bach’s Cello suite no. 6 and Cello suite no. 1–5.
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/9931309
Answer:
The answer would be D
Explanation:
They were both strong supporters of the Confederacy. They were both committed to gaining the right to vote and were both Democrats elected to statewide office. The movement helped them be able to do all of this.
Answer: The Tang Dynasty lasted from 608-907 CE. During this dynasty, China became the largest nation in the world. It covered most of the territory of present-day China, Vietnam and much of Central Asia as far as eastern Kazakhstan.
During his time, the first comprehensive criminal code was created. Literary flourished, and Chinese poetry was at its peak. The world's earliest dated printed book also came from this Dynasty. An improved form of gunpowder and porcelain was manufactured. Their porcelain was shipped of to islamic land, and highly praised there.
Explanation:hope this helps
Uf23yhdgjhghgggggggggggggggggggggggggģggggggvvvvvvvvvv
Ah, the scientific method. Well. Here it is:
1. Ask a question.
Be specific! Define your variables. Tara might like to ask something like “What are the effects of text-messaging rather than talking on the quality of friendships?” But she needs to define what counts as high quality and low quality friendship. Besides, what effects does she mean?
2. Make a hypothesis.
Something like “I believe the more text-messaging involved rather than taking, the lower quality the friendship will be.” Again, she should define her variables better. Make sure to use an independent and dependant variable.
3. Collect data.
Find a way to collect data. Surveys? Interviews? In-field observation? Keep it objective and informative. Remember the Hawthorne effect- don’t get to close to participants if it’s a study.
4. Represent your data.
Some people like using graphs or charts or some sort. Find a simple way to represent the data so it is easily understood.
5. Analyze and conclude
What conclusions can she draw from her research and data? Did it prove her hypothesis correct? If so, how? What else can she say about what she noticed?
There can be more or less official steps depending on your point of view. Some people like to include material lists, or theories, or sources of error. Do what you wish, but the scientific method cannot be used without first asking a question.
