1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ra1l [238]
3 years ago
12

When the sniper shoots first the soldier in the armored vehicle and then the old woman, the reader can logically conclude that

English
1 answer:
Amiraneli [1.4K]3 years ago
6 0
That the sniper is the antagonist of that scene, because he shoots, (only if we assume the soldier is there to help the people and the old lady is an innocent bystander), two innocent people. Depending on the backstory of why the sniper was shooting them and why the soldier was even there in the first place, there could be a completely different answer.
You might be interested in
When examining the word parts, what conclusion can you draw about the word “unknown”? If you take away the prefix “un-“, the roo
Alinara [238K]

The correct answer is the last option: If you take away the suffix –n and the prefix un-, the root word is “know”.

Prefixes and suffixes are sets of letters that are added at the beginning (prefix) or end of a word (suffix). They are not words by themselves, but they do change the words' meanings or categories.

In this case, the root is know. The suffix -n is used to change the word's category from verb (know) to noun (known). While, the prefix un- is used to mean NOT. As a result the meaning of the word UNKOWN would be not known or familiar.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Musya8 [376]
The answer is Point Of View. Point of view<span> is the angle of considering things, which shows us the opinion, or feelings of the individuals involved in a situation.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which literary term helps to tell where and when a story will take place? pronouns setting purpose theme
Darina [25.2K]
The answer to your question is theme
4 0
3 years ago
Is the sentence "Mother made sandwiches for her and me." ungrammatical?
Kaylis [27]

Answer:

No, it's not ungrammatical

Explanation:

 The sentence <em>"Mother made sandwiches for her and me"</em>  is correct  and follows the rules of grammar. The personal pronouns are used as subject (I, you, he, she, it, we, they) and/or object (me, you, him, her, it, us, them). In this sentence,  the use of the pronouns "her" and "me" is correct because they are objects of the preposition "for". "...for her and me (us)".

4 0
3 years ago
What is a parts to whole analogy?
Kamila [148]
The correct answer is - <span>an analogy that shows a relationship between a thing and its elements.
As the name itself says, a parts to whole analogy studies the relationship between parts of a particular thing and that entire thing. For example, the relationship between chapters and a book and songs and a CD - a book contains many chapters, just like a CD contains many songs. </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Do you think the concept of identity has changed since Shakespeare's time? Do last names hold as much weight as they once did?
    7·1 answer
  • What relationship do papi and the speaker have In the story exile?
    9·1 answer
  • Rewrite the sentence and fix the grammar mistakes.
    14·2 answers
  • 1 Kids in school are now<br> memorizing his
    11·1 answer
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME WRITE A PLOT FOR A FABLE<br> INCLUDE ANIMALS HAS CHARACTERS.
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following authors provided the writer with information about the locations of Flora Scott's buildings?
    15·2 answers
  • What is the role of the leader in a group discussion?
    8·1 answer
  • Which is an example of internal conflict?
    11·1 answer
  • “White-Eyes”
    10·1 answer
  • How can a character’s flaw be both a burden and a virtue?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!