The answer for the first one is <em><u>Congruent</u></em> and for the second for the second is <em><u>No</u></em>
∠1 and ∠2 are supplementary // given∠3 and ∠4 are supplementary // given∠1 ≅ ∠3 // given m∠1 + m∠2 = 180° // definition of supplementary anglesm∠3 + m∠4 = 180° // definition of supplementary angles m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠3 + m∠4 // transitive property of equality m∠1 = m∠3 // definition of congruent angles m∠1 + m∠2 = m∠1 + m∠4 // substitution property of equality (replaced m∠3 with m∠1) m∠2 = m∠4 // subtraction property of equality (subtracted m∠1 from both sides) ∠2 ≅ ∠4 // definition of congruent angles
Answer:
Systematic error
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming that none of the judges are biased, the most likely reason for this difference is the occurrence of systematic errors.
Systematic errors are errors introduced by inaccuracy in the experimental design, be it in the observation or measurement process.
In this case, the reaction time from observing the finish and stopping the clock for each judge might be different, which configures a systematic error.
Answer:
32 guests
Step-by-step explanation:
96 divided by 3
