Answer:
I believe it's the last one.
Explanation:
One needs to look now farther than the first paragraph to realize that Vonnegut's tale is laced with irony and satire. The strongest hint is when he mentions that there are over 100 ammendments in the Constitution. All these ammendments are designed to make society "perfect." Later on George and his wife Hazel are discussing how George's handicaps, the bags of birdshot tied to his legs, are terribly inconvenient and painful. Hazel suggests George break a law and remove the bags since he isn't competing against anyone at home. George replies that if he broke the law so would others and they'd end up right back in the "Dark Ages". These examples depict there is no such thing as a perfect society. Equality does not bring about perfection and competition is essential for a thriving economy. In every society there are winners and losers.
Sorry if i'm wrong.
The answer is A. Kotowski cites four scholars who specialize in the study of volcanoes, whereas Ferguson cites only the encyclopedia.
The given thesis is arguing that Kotowski is more reliable than Ferguson because he backs up his statements with a greater number of more reliable sources. In choice A, Kotowski is not only using three more sources than Ferguson, but they're sources from reputable specialists, making them higher quality sources as well.
If you're still confused, you can use elimination to rule out the others:
B. B doesn't work because there's no mention of the rate of volcanic change in the thesis. Although the statement may be true, it's not evidence to support the writer's claim.
C. C doesn't work because there's no mention of the frequency of volcanic eruption in the thesis. Again, although the statement may be true, it doesn't necessarily support the writer's claim.
D. D doesn't work because there's no mention of the similarities between the two pieces. If the thesis is arguing that Kotowski's work is different from Ferguson's because it's more reliable, it'd be counterproductive for the writer to mention the similarities of the work. Therefore, this "evidence" has no relation to the thesis and would not support the author's thesis.
Hope this helps!
Answer:The answer is B
Explanation:
WE know this because in school they taught us what a opinion is. SOmething that you think about the subject. Your also not wrong to giving your opinion. Hope this helped G!
Answer:
Explanation:
Para empatizar en este nuevo escenario y acordar nuevos roles, es necesario contar con momentos para hablar sobre la nueva experiencia de escolaridad. Preguntar a profesores, estudiantes y familias cómo se sienten, qué necesitan, qué ideas o ayudas pueden ofrecer para resguardar el aprendizaje y bienestar de los estudiantes. Por medio del diálogo se construyen los significados que cada uno atribuirá a esta nueva experiencia. Por ejemplo, si llamamos tareas al trabajo escolar, a los estudiantes les puede parecer que es mucho trabajo en relación a lo que hacían antes. Es importante recordarles que lo que están realizando en este nuevo formato son actividades escolares en casa, con apoyo de sus profesores a distancia, mientras no puedan volver físicamente a la escuela. Si un adulto está acompañando el trabajo escolar en casa, es importante que el niño pueda distinguir esa función, sin confundirla con otros momentos de juego y descanso, considerando que ni uno ni lo otro son reemplazables.
