The number of hours it would take for half of the workers to complete the same job is 96 hours.
<h3>How much does it take to 6 workers to complete the job?</h3>
It is already known 6 workers working at the same rate can complete this job in a total of 48 hours, which means each of the workers represents approximately:
- 8 hours of work (48 / 6 = 8).
<h3>What happens if the number of workers is reduced?</h3>
In this case, it expected the total of hours to complete the same job increase. Moreover, the time will proportionally increase depending on the reduction of workers. Here are some examples:
- -1/3 of workers = +1/3 of time
- -1/5 of workers = + 1/5 of time
This means by reducing the workers to half of the team (-1/2) the time will duplicate.
Note: This question is incomplete; here is the possible complete question.
All the workers on a 6 person team work at the same rate. All six members of the team, working together, are able to pour foundations in 48 hours. How many hours would this job take if only half of the team worked on this task.
Learn more about hours in: brainly.com/question/15908953
Answer:
the bus student are fatter ususaly than the ones who walk because the lack of vitiman d in their skin
Explanation:
Hey there! :)
Your answer is mean
_____________________________________________________________
Mean is the average value of the data set.
Mode is the number that appears the most
Range is the difference between the greatest value and the lowest value in a data set.
Finding the mode is pretty useless because you can't do much with the score that you got the most.
Range isn't that helpful because it's the difference between your best and worst score.
Mean is best for summarizing because you have 1 number that's the average of the whole data set.
______________________________________________________________
Therefore, the answer is mean
Hope this helps :)
Answer:grants
Explanation:because why would you pay off a grant
Hello
We can approach science from various angles. It may be that our aim is to solve a problem or to try to understand something. But, at the same time, what we find in it as explanatory or credible may be different if our profession is to be a trader, an importer of industrial equipment, a researcher or a teacher. Our concerns about science may differ according to the angle from which we think about it. That is to say, what is important when judging or evaluating science is different according to our relationship with it at certain times: whether we see it as producers, disseminators or consumers. Therefore, from the outset we have an area of complexity in thinking about science from our starting point.
