Answer:
Hedonism and utilitarianism are similar in their evaluation of the goal of moral behaviour as some version of pleasure or happiness and the minimization of its opposite. They can both view pleasure or happiness as simple and immediate, or complex and matured. Where they differ is the scope of evaluation which justifies the behaviour as moral. Hedonism tends to be individualistic while utilitarianism tends to be social. A utilitarian must evaluate the happiness result for the total consequence of an action, which typically effects many people. A hedonist could very well throw consequences to the wind if the action feels good to him or herself. In a sense, you might consider utilitarianism to be model for social hedonism.
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation: is there any multiple choice??
1. if you win but don't deserve it 2. study 3. computer, compliment. No they do not,
Unethical corporate behavior would have no negative impact on a community if it were to lead to an economic decline is false.
<u>Explanation:</u>
An economic decline is in all manners a negative trait irrespective of what actions it has surfaced through. Unethical corporate behavior, in the first place, can be deemed to be a negative activity responsible for the loss and eventual decline of the market, leading it to an overall economic decline.
It is because of certain unethical corporate practices followed by only a few players that are a part of the market, the entire market suffers and pays the cost.
