Hey there!
I believe these are the followings:
The defendant pleads guilty to the charges at his arraignment.
<span>The teacher testified that Goode would not break the law. </span>
<span>The police officer could not find any evidence against Goode. </span>
<span>The neighbor said that Goode sold him stolen video games.
</span>
The statement that is true about the case of State v. Justin B. Goode is that the teacher testified that Goode would not break the law
Hope this helps!:)
What was the question? I didn’t quite understand
Answer:
what paragraph? also you sure this is history?
Answer:
The act was designed to limit the power of monopolies and trusts.
The act did not lead to many successful government prosecutions.
The fact that the act did not define the terms “monopoly” and “trust” limit the act.
Support from the federal courts would have made the act more effective.
Explanation:
If you don't have a book to help you with this, then it's undeniably the teacher's fault - if you do, you either want to provide it to us, or look at it to obtain your answers.
