When I was younger, Maryam, a girl who lived next door to me was rather affable. It was easy talking to her because she showed enthusiasm in everything I did. Maryam was three years older than me and had recently lost her elder sister, who died in a terrible car accident. The loss of her sister deeply affected Maryam, and her character transformed immensely. Previously being a vivacious girl, she was now lethargic, sitting at one place doing nothing. She procrastinated with everything. One day, I aspired her to try out something new instead of sitting around and doing nothing. This pushed a trigger in her memories, and she recalled her halcyon days of childhood. She laughed at the memory of her elder sister, whom everyone had loved because she was down-to-earth and not haughty.
Answer:
A careful rereading of this excerpt would help a reader understand the "League" mentioned in the first sentence because:
C. The reader could make the connection between the “League” and the third sentence, which explains that they “organized strikes in the garment trade.”
Explanation:
According to the third line of the excerpt, the League had organized strikes in the garment trade. This same League, according to the first and second lines, had organized a new event and was surprised at the turnout of so many people now - so many that the speakers uses the word "army" to help readers visualize it. From that, we can infer that the League refers to a group of people who helped coordinate and organize protests and sit-ins in the pursuit of equality during the Civil Rights Movement.
Yes I think they are more intelligent than we think and it would most likely happen if they are caged cause most animals are mostly peaceful they only attack if they feel threatened even poisonous snakes they try not to be in your way but if u see them they do strike but they never do intentionally even sharks don’t attack right away I think that when animals are held in captivity they become more violent cause there not supposed so be in small little cages. in conclusion yes, yes they can strategically attack us if they have to
you have too sight the last name of the author and the page number whether it is a quote or paraphrased. the only time you don't have to is if you include it in the sentence.
Example for when you don't have to cite in text:
On page 13 Martin says, "blah blah bah bluh bleh blah"
... otherwise just put the citation in parentheses after the quote/paraphrase like so: (Martin,13)
The correct answer is the last option: If you take away the suffix –n and the prefix un-, the root word is “know”.
Prefixes and suffixes are sets of letters that are added at the beginning (prefix) or end of a word (suffix). They are not words by themselves, but they do change the words' meanings or categories.
In this case, the root is know. The suffix -n is used to change the word's category from verb (know) to noun (known). While, the prefix un- is used to mean NOT. As a result the meaning of the word UNKOWN would be not known or familiar.
