1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mel-nik [20]
3 years ago
8

Shakespeare’s use of more than 10 syllables per line

English
1 answer:
irga5000 [103]3 years ago
5 0

if your doing apex the answer is:

A. draws attention to the line, perhaps making it seem more important.

hope this helps :)

You might be interested in
Turn the following exclamations into the Indirect Speech:
MrMuchimi
1. "I said that I got lost."
2. "I said that it was a glorious view."
3. "My mom said that there is terrible weather."
4. "My mom said that my sister is a silly girl."
5. "I said that it is cold."
8 0
3 years ago
Summary conclusion of the circus elephant.<br><br>​
Flura [38]

Elephants have bolted from circuses, run amok through streets, crashed into buildings, attacked members of the public, and injured and killed handlers. The elephants have been injured, too, and some have been killed in a hail of bullets.

8 0
3 years ago
Transform these:
NNADVOKAT [17]

Answer:

1. I remember his name

2. Now I know it's jerry

3. He broke an axe handle once

4. But he took the money

5. He was like in a cloudless sky twinkling

8 0
3 years ago
Why does Wiesel talk about himself in the third person?
navik [9.2K]

Answer:

The answer is "The emphasis of the speech stays on Wiesel's frightening experiences as a child." Wiesel's use of the first person allows him to give a more individual view of the story as a whole. These are his knowledges, they are not neutral because this is his story. The first person is the finest way for him to deliver the things he needs to tell, and the third person would have through the story more universal not personal.

Explanation:

I know that this is none of the answer choices but I hope it helps (:

5 0
3 years ago
Write a part to whole analogy that compares two types of transportation. Then, rewrite the analogy so that it shows a whole to p
MA_775_DIABLO [31]

Answer:

A part to whole analogy that compares two types of transportation is ''wheel is to car as motor is to boat". The way to rewrite the analogy so that it shows a whole to part relationship. is "car is to wheel as boat is to motor".

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which shows a complex sentence with a correctly indicated main clause?
    6·1 answer
  • Pronoun in the sentence.<br><br> The raccoons are sneaky ; I don’t know what to do about them
    5·1 answer
  • Translate the following analogy into a sentence or phrase.<br><br> mice:mouse::oxen:ox
    6·2 answers
  • In "Atalanta, the Fleet-Footed Huntress," why is the king of Arcadia angry when Atalanta is born?
    5·2 answers
  • Does i ran to the closet grabbed my coat and hurried out the door. need commas
    14·2 answers
  • A student who paraphrases an author’s ideas, but does not quote the author’s exact words, must still cite the author in both the
    9·2 answers
  • Which of the following techniques is key in the process of close reading?
    8·1 answer
  • What did Shakespeare study while in grammar school?
    11·1 answer
  • What is a consonant sound​
    10·1 answer
  • The arrangement of ideas in such a way that the audience can easily follow from one point to another is called?
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!