Ask question

Ask question

All categories

3 years ago

15

Terry wants to tip 15% to the waiter at a restaurant this means he will multiply the cost by 0.15 if this meal costs 18.10 how m

uch did he tip the waiter

1 answer:

Katen [24]3 years ago

7 0

just as the problem states, multiply the cost (18.10) by 0.15

18.10 * 0.15 = 2.72

the tip was $2.72

You might be interested in

I need answers to this

devlian [24]

1 . 489

2. 3

3. 4.9

4. 28.5

5. 6.15

6. 22100

7. 25400

8. 0.5

9. 0.14

10. 0.973

5 0

3 years ago

What is the lateral area of the rectangular prism? Assume the prism is resting on its base. A. 135 in2 B. 270 in2 C. 300 in2 D.

Olegator [25]

You have the length of the sides? If not: a and b is the length of the scratch, h is the height <span>This lateral surface area = 2ah+2bh=2h(a+b)</span>

8 0

3 years ago

How to approximate to 3 significant figures

kondaur [170]

Answer:

We round a number to three significant figures in the same way that we would round to three decimal places. We count from the first non-zero digit for three digits. We then round the last digit. We fill in any remaining places to the right of the decimal point with zeros.

3 0

3 years ago

According to the US Bureau of labor statistics, 7% of US female workers between 16 and 24 years old are paid at the minimum wage

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Decision rule

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

Conclusion

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

The percentage of US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is $k_o =$ 7% = 0.07

The sample size is $n = 500$

The number paid minimum wage or less is x = 42

The significance level is $\alpha =$ 5% = 0.05

Now the probability of getting a US female workers paid at the minimum wage or less is mathematically represented as

$\= k = \frac{x}{n}$

substituting value

$\= k = \frac{42}{500}$

$\= k = 0.084$

The Null Hypothesis is $H_o:k_o = 0.07$

The alternative hypothesis is $H_a :k_o \ne 0.07$

Generally the test statistics is mathematically evaluated as

$z = \frac{\= k - k_o}{\sqrt{\frac{k_o(1-k_o)}{n} } }$

substituting value

$z = \frac{0.084 - 0.07}{\sqrt{\frac{0.07 (1-0.07)}{500} } }$

$z = 1.23$

Now the Decision rule is stated as

If the test staistics is greater than the critical value of significance level then $H_o$ is accepted else $H_o$ is rejected

With the above in mind

The critical value of the significance level which is obtained from the table is

$t_{0.05} = 1.645$

Now since the critical value of significance level is greater than the test staistics then the null hypothesis will be rejected

So the conclusion will be

The information is not enough to back the claim that state differs from the nation

4 0

3 years ago

Does anyone know this??

blagie [28]

Answer:

x = 38, y = 4

Step-by-step explanation:

Since AB = BC then the triangle is isosceles and the base angles are congruent, that is

∠ DAB = ∠ DCB = 52°

Subtract the sum of the base angle from 180° for ∠ ABC

∠ ABC = 180° - (52 + 52)° = 180° - 104° = 76°

Note that ∠ ABD = ∠ CBD, thus

x = 76 ÷ 2 = 38

BD bisects the side AC, thus DC = AD = 4

Thus y = 4

5 0

3 years ago