Answer:
a. 199,389
b. b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Step-by-step explanation:
a. Population in 2009 = 192,370
This means that in 2005 the population = 192,370 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 x 1.009 = 199,389
b. From the part A, the question suggests a 0.9% yearly decrease which amounts to 199,389. This answer does not correspond to their recorded figure because the 0.9% decrease was just an average taken over the period. There could be years that the decrease was way smaller than the recorded average, thus using average may not be a good way for calculating population decrease over a period of time.
Answer:
(-3,0)
Step-by-step explanation:
I just plugged in each ordered pair till i found the correct one. But you could also graph the line y= 2x + 6 and see which coordinate it goes through
Answer:
46 housewives read all three magazines.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given:
n(A) = 150
n(B) = 200
n(C) = 156
n(A∩B) = 48
n(B∩C) = 60
n(A∩C) = 52
n(A∪B∪C) = 300
so we know the relation as:
n(A∪B∪C) = n(A) + n(B) + n(C) - n(A∩B) - n(B∩C) - n(A∩C) + n(A∩B∩C)
∴ n(A∩B∩C) = n(A) + n(B) + n(C) - n(A∩B) - n(B∩C) - n(A∩C) - n(A∪B∪C)
= 150 + 200+ 156 - 48 - 60 - 52 - 300
= 46
Hence the number of housewives that had read all three magazine is 46.
You would find that in the first quadrant.
Answer:
A=314 feet
Step-by-step explanation:
