Answer:
the will made with undue influence
Explanation:
A testator is simply an anyone who writes a will and also anyone who executes a valid will or a given legacy.
In this scenario called undue influence where a person influences or persuades the testator to alter or make some changes his or her will due to the fact that the testator vulnerable state(emotionally and physically unstable).
Anyone can influences a testator. the people who can easily persuade a testator to make changes in his/her will are those who are close to the testator and also recognizes that the testator is not emotionally and physically stable and so they persuades the testator to agree to their demand and make the changes in the will.
The Wagner Act helped to aid organized labor because it guaranteed the labor unions to the right to bargain collectfully on equal terms with employers. The Wagner Act is also known as the The National Labor Relations Act of 1935. Workers that were under the union were protecded from being fired or being punished by being in an union.
This is the kind of concept a utilitarian would agree on. If the result is positive for a large group of people, we should seriously consider doing it.
However, I would like to comment on this concept. In my opinion (and that's what you're asking for) there are situations in which the ends don't justify the means. You can e.g. think about mass-bombings to fight against terrorism. However, the possibility exists that innocent people will be hit, and will die. Therefore, the end don't always justify the means (in my opinion).
Major threats to pioneer life and limb came from accidents, exhaustion, and disease. Crossing rivers were probably the most dangerous thing pioneers did. Swollen rivers could tip over and drown both people and oxen. Such accidents could cause the loss of life and most or all of valuable supplies.
