What the three cases have in common is that they were all victories for the people and their amendment guaranteed rights against states who wanted to obstruct those. The first case was about preventing states from limiting freedom of speech, the second was about preventing illegally obtained evidence from being used in court, and the third was that the states have an obligation to provide a lawyer to criminals if they can't pay for them.
One of the ways in which the Apollo 11 flight plan could be seen as a historical document is if it is used as some kind of primary source. Technically, any document written in the past is a historical document.
The answer to your question is B: It explains the organization of the federal government.
Shay’s rebellion was an imperative in showing that the Articles of Confederation, the United States first constitution, had significant flaws and needed to either be changed or replaced. Since the US federal government had no control over the states, they did not have the ability to call on a reliable army to stop the rebellion. The 13 states at the time could not be held accountable for anything. This flaw in the Articles of Confederation showed that a stronger federal government was needed in order to keep order in American society.
Answer:
probable cause
Explanation:
Informants' tips point to this as the most likely explanation. In various decisions, the Supreme Court has been split on the issue of establishing probable cause based on information obtained from an eyewitness.
More about probable cause
brainly.com/question/14885071
