I don’t think so. He implies women are only to be wives and mothers, which also implies the old statuses of men working, voting, owning property and women not being allowed to do so. This is not just the Justice’s personal opinion to keep to himself, and he says civil society must be based on the “law of the creator.” Personally, I think his perspective is rubbish
Answer:
no
Explanation:
I don't think so because many people learn new languages everyday.
I guess I don’t know who that is
The Stamp Act of 1765 was levied mainly at the American Colonists in order for the British to make money off of them. The colonists did not want the stamp act, and stated that it was unconstitutionanal, and became extremely violent. Parliament repealed the Stamp Act in 1766, but passed another one in a different name that includes what the Stamp Act had in it.
hope this helps
The colonists became extremely violent* is key
Explanation:
okay since the pple don't want a king maybe they should come up with a constitution and make rules that suit and benefit every citizen in one way or another and maybe appoint one person to be in charge of the constitution
