Answer:
either belief or stupid but i'm pretty sure its probably belief
Explanation:
Answer:
A. It illustrates how many people from underserved communities go down a negative path and it makes Davis’s ascent all the more remarkable by comparison.
Explanation:
According to a different source, these are the options that come with this question:
A. It illustrates how many people from underserved communities go down a negative path and it makes Davis’s ascent all the more remarkable by comparison.
B. It demonstrates the impact the death of a childhood friend had on Davis, who would go on to become an emergency room physician.
C. It shows that a life of crime will inevitably result in an untimely death or permanent incarceration.
D. It advances the notion that Newark, New Jersey is an underserved city.
In this text, we learn about the journey of Sampson Davis. Davis was born in Newark, NJ, and when he was young, he was involved in an armed robbery with a boy named Don Moses. However, when Davis grew up, he became a physician, while Don Moses continued to be a robber. Don Moses eventually died at the hospital where Davis worked.
The anecdote, as well as the quote, highlights the fact that both Davis and Don Moses started in the same place, but their lives turned out to be very different. This highlights the difficulties that people in these communities have to lead positive lives, as well as the strength of character Davis displayed by choosing to improve his life.
Borges's story The Garden of Forking Paths can be considered to be a three dimensional chess game for a variety of reasons. First, like a game of chess, a nearly infinite number of possible outcomes are proposed through the story (just as how a chess game can allow for a variety of different outcomes). Also, chess is a game of choice, just as the Garden of Forking Paths - both the story itself and the novel of the same titles mentioned in the story - allows for the reader to, in essence, choose their own design and strategy. Furthermore, the lead character\protagonist in the story is manipulating events throughout the story to, in essence, score a "checkmate."
Elie Wiesel's literary work prompted one reviewer to recall Isaac Bashevis Singer's definition of Jews as "a people who can't sleep themselves and let nobody else sleep," and to predict, "While Elie Wiesel lives and writes, there will be no rest for the wicked, the uncaring or anyone else." [1<span>] If uneasiness is the result of Wiesel's work, it is not a totally unintended result. Since the publication of </span>Night<span> in 1958, Wiesel, a Jewish survivor of the Nazi death camps, has borne a persistent, excruciating literary witness to the Holocaust. His works of fiction and non-fiction, his speeches and stories have each had the same intent: to hold the conscience of Jew and non-Jew (and, he would say, even the conscience of God) in a relentless focus on the horror of the Holocaust and to make this, the worst of all evils, impossible to forget.</span>
Wiesel refuses to allow himself or his readers to forget the Holocaust because, as a survivor, he has assumed the role of messenger. It is his duty to witness as a "messenger of the dead among the living," [2] and to prevent the evil of the victims' destruction from being increased by being forgotten. But he does not continue to retell the tales of the dead only to make life miserable for the living, or even to insure that such an atrocity will not happen again. Rather, Elie Wiesel is motivated by a need to wrestle theologically with the Holocaust.
The grim reality of the annihilation of six million Jews presents a seemingly insurmountable obstacle to further theological thought: how is it possible to believe in God after what happened? The sum of Wiesel's work is a passionate effort to break through this barrier to new understanding and faith. It is to his credit that he is unwilling to retreat into easy atheism, just as he refuses to bury his head in the sand of optimistic faith. What Wiesel calls for is a fierce, defiant struggle with the Holocaust, and his work tackles a harder question: how is it possible not to believe in God after what happened? [3]
(つ ^‿^ )つHey there!
Answer → Exposure to blue light during the day can help maintain a healthy circadian rhythm but exposure to blue light at night can disrupt sleep leading to an increase in tiredness the next day. So I would say it's ✨Yes✨
