Answer:
Shrugs.
Explanation:
The word shrugs describes the person's body language, which coincides with what she says, creating a resigned tone. If her expression, would have been different, for example, a smiling face while she talks, the tone would not have been of resignation. With that gesture, we can see that she has accepted the way things are and sounds defeated.
I think it would be B (Finally, they found their dog, cat, and bird) because in this case, Finally doesn't need a comma however the other three sentences need commas.
Scout is the daughter of Atticus. They both show that they don’t judge people, as shown when Atticus accepts the trial of a man that was wrongly accused.
Scout has a basic faith in the goodness of people in her community. As the novel progresses, this faith is tested by the hatred and prejudice that emerge during the trial. She eventually develops a more grown-up perspective that enables her to appreciate human goodness without ignoring human evil.
Atticus instilled this strong sense of morality and justice into his children. He is one of the few residents in his community to support racial equality. When he accepts the trial to defend Tom Robinson, he exposes himself and his family to the anger of the white community. With his strongly held convictions, wisdom, and empathy, Atticus functions as the novel’s moral backbone.
In other words, both Atticus and Scout have a strong sense of morality. Atticus is wiser than Scout is, and has a deeper understanding of morality than Scout does. Throughout the novel, Scout grows and learns a better concept of morality and a better concept of people.
We just start learning this lessen today
i think its metaphor
In Mark Antony’s speech, it can be seen that Mark Antony
attempts to win over the mob to his side by a number of things. First, he begins the speech with “Friends,
Romans, country men.” By beginning the
speech by calling those present “Friends,” he relates to those present by
insinuating he is just like them and that they are all friends. Next, Mark Antony carefully avoids the use of
negativity and “finger pointing” by only stating the positive Julius Cesar has
done. He presents the positive actions
he observed of Julius Cesar as a sort of rebuttal to the view some senators had
of Julius Cesar as “ambitious.” By
stating placing himself with the view as an equal to those present in the mob
and by remaining positive with positive choice of words and descriptions, he
succeeds in winning over the mob.
