1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ivanzaharov [21]
3 years ago
5

1. How did the Boston Sons of Liberty show their opposition in 1773? 2. Why do you think they decided to destroy the tea? 3.What

other action could they have taken? Do you think it would have been effective? 4. What can we do today as American citizens to protest laws that we consider unjust?
Social Studies
1 answer:
MakcuM [25]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Find the explanation below.

Explanation:

1. The Boston Sons of Liberty showed their opposition on December 16, 1773, when they threw tea being brought into the American colonies by the British East India Company overboard the sea. The event is known as the Boston Tea Party and it was a result of the <em>Tea Act</em> passed by the British Parliament who gave their company the monopoly to import tea to the colonies.

2. I think that they decided to destroy the tea because if it got to the American colonies, they would be bought by people and this would affect the sales of tea by the American traders who sourced their tea from the Dutch. The taxes imposed on this tea as well as the monopoly that was granted to the British East India Company would also have negative consequences on the economy of the colonists.

3. They might have allowed the tea to land and then explain to the people reasons why they should boycott it. I do not think that this would have been effective because some people would have still found a way to buy the tea once it was within their reach.

4. Activism, lobbying, dialogue with the appropriate authorities, and peaceful protests should be the best routes to consider in countering laws perceived as unjust by the American citizenry.

You might be interested in
Opposes power of cooperations, favoring decision making at grassroots level
koban [17]

Answer:

Petition

Explanation:

Is it multiple choice? If so, i'll add multiple answers to get what i want

4 0
3 years ago
g he US replaced Britain as the leader of the International System after WW II. They now carry the costs associated with such In
Alex17521 [72]

Answer:

a. Long Cycle Theory

Explanation:

In international relations theory, the Long Cycle Theory was first presented by  George Modelski in his book <em>Long Cycles in World Politics</em> (1987). Modelski claims that <u>the US replacing Britain as the leader of the International System after World War II is part of a cycle in international relations where one hegemon is gradually replaced by another over a period of roughly a century</u>.

The transition from one hegemonic power to another leads to the new world power carrying on the costs associated with such a position. And unlike defenders of the realist school of international relations, Modelski doesn't see this cycle as produced by the anarchy of the internationals system, but rather as a natural consequence of economic and political developments, including wars. According to him, Portugal was the world hegemon in the 16th century, Netherlands in the 17th century, Britain stretched his period of international dominance over the 18th and 19th century, and since the 20th century, the United States is the world's dominant hegemon.

3 0
3 years ago
If a roasting is 600mm x 500mm how many 25cm cake time will fit on it?
Butoxors [25]
This is what i got
Only 2 of the 25cm cake will fit in a 600mm x 500mm

600mm=60cm
500mm=50cm

60 divided by 25 : 2.4
50 divided by 25 : 2
so the best it could fit is 2 of the 25cm cakes
3 0
3 years ago
Umm... I got this question from my friend !<br><br>How would you put an elephant in your fridge ?​
postnew [5]
Make elephant soup!!
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In traditional naturalistic observation, the subject or subjects being studied __________. A. Will have to sign a waiver to auth
eimsori [14]

The subject or subjects being observed in classic naturalistic observation may be unaware that they are being observed.

The correct option is (B).

<h3>What is naturalistic observation?</h3>

Naturalistic observation is a technique for seeing subjects in their natural setting.

The goal is to observe behavior in an unaltered natural environment.

Researchers may keep track of what they see by making notes or tallies.

Thus, the correct statement is (B) Maybe unaware that observation is being conducted.

Learn more about naturalistic observation, here:

brainly.com/question/8187021

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • what is electrical college? how does it work? why did our fore-fathers create it? what are some pros and cons?​
    6·1 answer
  • In 1997, a federal jury found Timothy McVeigh guilty of 11 counts, ranging from conspiracy to first-degree murder, in the Oklaho
    10·2 answers
  • Tyler is vacationing in a new city. he isn't quite sure where his hotel is. he knows it's near the beach. tyler also realizes th
    9·1 answer
  • Jerome is a collegiate track athlete and Leon is an obese person. They both drink the same type and amount of alcohol at the sam
    14·1 answer
  • Which president got a speeding ticket?
    12·2 answers
  • When passing on an open highway, drivers should not pass a vehicle if oncoming traffic in the opposing lane is within ___ feet o
    10·1 answer
  • A relationship in which one species benefits and the other is harmed is
    9·2 answers
  • What textual evidence supports that Japanese Americans were forced to leave their homes? Check all that apply.
    12·1 answer
  • How many people died during the Cold War
    14·2 answers
  • What resistance training style is a combination of partial repetitions and isometric holds?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!