Answer:
Quebec's distinctive language and culture have led many of its residents to ask for separation from the rest of Canada from time to time. Quebec has long been different from the rest of Canada, even when the whole region was still part of the British Empire rather than an independent country. However, Quebec has never mustered enough electoral will to vote for independence.
The Parti Québécois has long led the fight for separation of the French-speaking part of Canada from the rest of the country. The division between Quebec and the rest of the country is rooted in the fact that while the French settled Quebec during the exploration period, the English ended up taking control of the province from the French. As a result, that part of Canada was left feeling a bit oppressed as the rest of the area was settled by the British.
Since 1970, the question of separatism for Quebec has roiled the country. Quebec is not only a large part of the country, it is a crucial one in terms of economic and industrial infrastructure. Its separation from Canada would leave a big hole in the middle of one of North America's most important nations, and it is difficult to predict the long-term effects of such a move. Because of this uncertainty, the referendums calling for Quebec to leave Canada have never carried the day.
Explanation:
There are no juries or witnesses in almost all of the cases the judges hear; instead, they are reviews of rulings from other courts.
<h3>Briefing:-</h3>
In formulating their final decision, the justices take into account the records they are provided, evidence, and the argument put forward before them, as well as decisions made by subordinate courts at each stage of a case.
<h3>What are the 4 steps in the Supreme Court's decision-making process?</h3>
Following oral arguments, the Justices have a private meeting to analyze the issue and decide how to vote.
Majority View. One of the Justices will write the ruling if more than half of the Court agrees with it (selected by the senior Justice among the majority).
Concurrence.
Dissent.
<h3>What determines a case's outcome?</h3>
Trials are often conducted in a similar manner in both criminal and civil proceedings. The jury decides the facts of the case and returns a decision after all the evidence has been presented and the judge has explained the relevant legal principles to the jury. In the absence of a jury, the case is decided by the judge.
To Know more about subordinate
brainly.com/question/3368897
#SPJ4
Throughout the history we can see a trend of giving citizenship to more and more people, rather than just to elites. For example, in the early stages of history only men possessed citizenship, and also significant portions of societies did not have the country's citizenship, such as in the case of slaves.
