1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
12

What two things did former British prime minister Winston Churchill affirm in his Iron Curtain speech?

History
2 answers:
vova2212 [387]3 years ago
5 0

1. his wish to side with the United States against the Soviet Union

2.his demand for the Soviet Union to be divided into two parts

Reil [10]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

his wish to side with the United States against the Soviet Union.

his demand for the Soviet Union to be divided into two parts.

Explanation:

The Iron Curtain speech adressed to the public by former English prime minister Winston Churchill was meant to raise awareness to the rising power that the USSR was having in the eastern Europe countries, with more and more countries being anexed, they were gaining more and more power and were seeing as the common enemy by the western hemisphere, USA, England and France were the main representatives of the western hemisphere and wanted to divide the USSR so they´d loose power they were trying to prevent a third world war.

You might be interested in
Why did a Cold War exist?
Orlov [11]
An ideological war existed? Sorry, its just your format is kind of awkward is all.
6 0
3 years ago
Que sabes sobre los primeros pueblos de america?
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

The first town in America was Jamestown, in Virginia. It was established in 1607.

5 0
3 years ago
How does the lost cause affect us today in the US
Delvig [45]
The Lost Cause of the Confederacy, or simply the Lost Cause, is an American pseudo-historical,[1][2] negationist ideology that advocates the belief that the cause of the Confederate States during the American Civil War was heroic, just, and not centered on slavery.[3] This ideology has furthered the belief that slavery was moral, because the enslaved were happy, even grateful, and it also brought economic prosperity. The notion was used to perpetuate racism and racist power structures during the Jim Crow era in the American South.[4] It emphasizes the supposed chivalric virtues of the antebellum South. It thus views the war as a struggle primarily waged to save the Southern way of life[5] and to protect "states' rights", especially the right to secede from the Union. It casts that attempt as faced with "overwhelming Northern aggression". It simultaneously minimizes or completely denies the central role of slavery and white supremacy in the build-up to, and outbreak of, the war.[4]
4 0
3 years ago
Where was the treaty of Versailles signed?
artcher [175]
Palace of Versailles’ Hall of Mirrors
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who did the intolerable acts
spayn [35]

Answer:

british

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Based on the foundations of federalism, why is health care under such an ongoing political debate?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the first president
    5·2 answers
  • Who is this (history needed) is school related
    10·1 answer
  • 12. The limited role that the federal government had with the states was ended by?
    7·1 answer
  • Paso 2: Lee la sección 2. Contesta las siguientes preguntas en
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me this is for 9th grade
    8·1 answer
  • Which statement is an example of a fact?<br>​
    14·2 answers
  • During the debate over ratification of the United States Constitution, Antifederalists argued that a bill of rights should be ad
    7·2 answers
  • If you were a member of the Brahmin caste (top social class/caste in Hinduism), how would you react to Buddha’s teachings? Why?
    11·1 answer
  • As late as 1900, a typical farm wife could expect to devote how many hours
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!