According to the question, Some negative effects of urbanization include the following.
- Crime
- Lack of Clean Water
- Fire
Urbanization brings about crime because it leads to less possibility of arrests and the less probability of recognition of crime suspect because families are less intact in urban areas.
Also the time of crimes committed in urban areas significantly differs from that in rural areas. some of the crimes include property thefts, automobile thefts, pick pocketing, cheating etc.
The process of rapid urbanization can bring about imbalance between water supply and demand and lead to higher likelihood of water shortage conditions.
With the spring up of factories and industries, natural water is polluted and hence there is lack of good water for human use.
Urban areas are more prone to deadly and severe fire outbreaks. this is due to the compact nature of buildings and the presence of industries that make use of elements which can lead to fire outbreak.
Learn more about Urbanization at brainly.com/question/12007420
#SPJ1
Answer:
Socrates's approach to seeking knowledge, and some of his fellow Athenians find it controversial is described below in detail.
Explanation:
Socrates evolved the dialectical method for obtaining knowledge. He practiced an inductive approach to argumentation to generate universal explanations. This was his approach to the certainty that would be developed by Plato. Socrates highlighted knowledge all his life because he considered that “the intelligence to differentiate between right and wrong rests in people's understanding, not in society.”
1.
The Confederates won
2.
<span>The First Battle of Bull Run (called First Manassas in the South) cost some 3,000 Union casualties, compared with 1,750 for the Confederates. Its outcome sent northerners who had expected a quick, decisive victory reeling, and gave rejoicing southerners a false hope that they themselves could pull off a swift victory. In fact, both sides would soon have to face the reality of a long, grueling conflict that would take an unimaginable toll on the country and its people.</span>
Answer:
"John (“Jack”) Reed wasn’t looking backward to the French Revolution or even the Paris Commune when he chronicled the seizure of power of the Russian Revolution of 1917. As a 30-year-old independent radical journalist, he was looking at it with fresh eyes. What he saw was not just the overthrow of a repressive monarchist oligarchy and its attendant bourgeois class, but a vast democratic, majoritarian movement based on “soviets,” or councils, made up of workers, soldiers, and peasants. Although he had been embedded in Pancho Villa’s rebel army in Mexico and covered Industrial Workers of the World strikes in New Jersey and miners’ struggles in Colorado, it was witnessing the cataclysmic events in Russia that confirmed him as a revolutionary."-Ten Days That Shook the World by John Reed
The Czechs and the Hungarians is the answer.
I hope this helps ya :)
