I believe the answer is: Monitor communications between them and facilitate direct collaboration
In this case, Facilitating direct collaboration is usually being done by providing a clear and direct method of communication between product owner and the development team, so the development team could directly ask for opinion for every differentiation that they made in the product.
Answer:
X=97.24
Explanation:
PV = Present Value = X+2000 by the 16th years
PMT = Payments = $100
FV = Future Value = 2000 at the end of 16 years
n= number of years
Applying the equation of future value for annuity
FV = pmt* ((1+r)ⁿ - 1
)/r
Inputting the values;
2000=100*((1+r)¹⁶-1)/r
Solving for r, gives r = 2.9%
Therefore using the formula for PV for annuity;
PV=PMT*(1-(1/1+r)/r)
X=100*(1-(1/1.029)/0.029
X=100*((1-0.9718)/0.029)
X=100*(0.0282/0.029)
X=97.24
Answer:
a. Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. Whataburger should hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost
Explanation:
a. According to the given data we have the following:
Let "C" is a cashier.
"K" is a kiosk
MPC = 48 (Marginal Product of Cashier)
MPK = 32 (Marginal Product of Kiosk)
PC = $15 (cashier can be hired for a wage of $15)
PK = $12 (Kiosk rents for $12)
At optimal cost minimization point, (MPC / MPK) = (PC / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (MPK / PK)
(MPC / PC) = (48 / 15) = 3.2
(MPK / PK) = (32 / 12) = 2.67
Since the (MPC / PC) and (MPK / PK) is not equal. It implies Whataburger is not using the optimal cost-minimizaing mix of cashier and kiosks.
b. We have to use the following:
(MPC / PC) > (MPK / PK)
i.e., 3.2 > 2.67
It means Whataburger hire more cashier and rent fewer kiosks in order to improve its mix of inputs and minimize the cost.
Based on the information given, the corporate bond will be recommended for Mr. Brown while the municipal bond will be recommended for Mr Black.
<u>Mr Brown:</u>
The after-yield tax on corporate bonds will be:
= Before tax yield × (1 - tax rate)
= 4% × (1 - 0.10)
= 3.60%
After tax yield on municipal bond will be:
= 3.5% × 1 = 3.5%
The corporate bond is recommended.
For <u>Mr. Black</u>
The after-yield tax on corporate bonds will be:
= 4% × (1 - 0.35)
= 2.60%
The after-yield tax on municipal bonds will be:
= 3.5% × 1
= 3.5%
Therefore, the municipal bond is recommended.
Red related link on:
brainly.com/question/25379770
Answer:
Option (b) is correct.
Explanation:
This is a case of monopoly market condition where there is a single firm operating the whole market. The price of the products is set by the single firm and the buyers in this market are price taker. The monopolist can earn normal profit, losses and abnormal profit in the short run and can earn normal profit and abnormal profit in the long run.
In our case, the price of diamonds is high because there is only single firm in the whole market and there is no other competitors in the market. That's why they are charging the higher prices.
