Answer:
Yes; the corresponding sides are proportional
Step-by-step explanation:
If two figures are similar, the lengths of their sides are proportional. This means if we set up a proportion with the sides we are given and cross-multiply, we get a true statement at the end of it.
Using the similarity statement ABCD~EFGH, we will compare AB to EF and BC to FG:
5/3 = 25/15
Cross multiply:
5(15) = 3(25)
75 = 75
We got a true statement, so the sides are proportional.
Answer:
-3
Step-by-step explanation:
you go down from the dot left most and you count towards the line that the second dot falls on and count over too it
Part A
The graph is shown below as an attached image.
The diagram shows a straight line that goes through the two points (0,-3) and (1, -5)
I'm using GeoGebra to graph the line.
side note: (0, -3) is the y intercept which is where the graph crosses the y axis.
==================================================
Part B
Answer is choice 2
The graph can be written in the form y = mx+b, so it is linear
In this case, m = -2 is the slope and b = -3 is the y intercept
We can write the slope as m = -2 = -2/1. This tells us that we can move down 2 units and then over to the right 1 units to get from point to point. This process of "down 2, over to the right 1" happens when moving from point A to point B in the diagram below.
![\bf \begin{cases} f(x)=\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\\\\ g(x)=\cfrac{x^3+2}{7} \end{cases}\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ now \\\\ f[\ g(x)\ ]\implies f\left[ \frac{x^3+2}{7} \right]\implies \sqrt[3]{7\left[ \frac{x^3+2}{7} \right]-2}\implies \sqrt[3]{x^3+2-2} \\\\\\ \sqrt[3]{x^3}\implies x\\\\ -----------------------------\\\\ or \\\\ g[\ f(x)\ ]\implies g\left[\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\right]\implies \cfrac{\left[\sqrt[3]{7x-2}\right]^3+2}{7} \\\\\\ \cfrac{7x-2+2}{7}\implies \cfrac{7x}{7}\implies x](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cbf%20%5Cbegin%7Bcases%7D%0Af%28x%29%3D%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%28x%29%3D%5Ccfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%0A%5Cend%7Bcases%7D%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Anow%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Af%5B%5C%20g%28x%29%5C%20%5D%5Cimplies%20f%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%20%5Cright%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7%5Cleft%5B%20%5Cfrac%7Bx%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%20%5Cright%5D-2%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%5E3%2B2-2%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7Bx%5E3%7D%5Cimplies%20x%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A-----------------------------%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Aor%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%0Ag%5B%5C%20f%28x%29%5C%20%5D%5Cimplies%20g%5Cleft%5B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5Cright%5D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B%5Cleft%5B%5Csqrt%5B3%5D%7B7x-2%7D%5Cright%5D%5E3%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%0A%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%5C%0A%5Ccfrac%7B7x-2%2B2%7D%7B7%7D%5Cimplies%20%5Ccfrac%7B7x%7D%7B7%7D%5Cimplies%20x)
thus f[ g(x) ] = x indeed, or g[ f(x) ] =x, thus they're indeed inverse of each other
I don't understand the English. I would've loved to help though.