B is the correct answer because the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all slaves in the United States.
Rather, it declared free only those slaves living in states not under Union control. The proclamation declared "that all persons held as slaves" within the rebellious states "are, and henceforward shall be free." It applied only to states that had seceded from the United States, leaving slavery untouched in the loyal border states. It also expressly exempted parts of the Confederacy (the Southern secessionist states) that had already come under Northern control.
McDonald v. City of Chicago, case in which on June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled (5–4) that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” applies to state and local governments as well as to the federal government.
The case arose in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired African American custodian, and others filed suit in U.S. District Court to challenge provisions of a 1982 Chicago law that, among other things, generally banned the new registration of handguns and made registration a prerequisite of possession of a firearm. The next day the National Rifle Association and others filed separate lawsuits challenging the Chicago law and an Oak Park, Ill., law that generally prohibited the possession or carrying of handguns and the carrying of other firearms except rifles or shotguns in one’s home or place of business. Each suit alleged that the law violated the right of individuals to possess and carry weapons, which the Supreme Court had found to be protected by the Second Amendment in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008). (Anticipating this finding, the plaintiffs in McDonald v. City of Chicago filed suit on the same morning that the decision in Heller was announced.) The crucial question, however, was whether the Second Amendment is applicable to the states and their political subdivisions. Citing “selective incorporation,” the Supreme Court’s gradual application to the states of most of the protections of the Bill of Rights through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (which prohibits the states from denying life, liberty, or property without due process of law), the plaintiffs argued that the Second Amendment is applicable through that clause as well as through the amendment’s “privileges or immunities” clause (which forbids the states from abridging the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States)
<u><em>Have a good day, afternoon or night!</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<em> ~Dreamer1331~</em>
I believe the statement given is true. <span>Slaves fared the worst on sugar plantations in the caribbean and brazil. Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day. Feel free to ask more questions. Thank you.</span>
I hope this helps
Ok so for starters number 1 is Job specialization benefited the Chinese Economy because the jobs were specializing in what China had produced.As a result of this China earned more money and produced for the jobs.
2.Ancient China made sure the amount of items traded were equally fair by setting a quota and a tariff this made there be a limit on how many goods were produced,how they were produced and for whom they were produced for.
3.Anceint China increased in trade because more country’s wanted to trade with China and the amount they produced increased as well because of the goods they produce and trade to other country’s.
4.Chinas tax system was not as strong so taxation was managed by a powerful government allowing China to control tax better.
5. The growth of trade rapidly changed in Chinese society because befor trade they had fewer things produced.As trade started the amount of things produced increased and made the country grow and change efficiently a lot.
6.China devoloped waterways, highways, and other transportation becouse like the production rate increased the goods and services did as well.