Under Price discrimination, an organization compares a few dimensions of its performance to that of another company, be it a competitor or in a totally distinctive industry.
Charge discrimination is a promoting method that fees clients one-of-a-kind charges for the same products or services based on what the seller thinks they can get the patron to comply with. In natural price discrimination, the vendor fees every customer the most fee they'll pay.
Charge discrimination refers to charging distinct clients special costs for the same true carrier. The Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act, and Robinson-Patman Act outlaw price discrimination while the intent of that discrimination is to harm competitors.
Price discrimination in a monopoly is a practice of charging extraordinary costs for an equal product. Monopolies generally have extra control over providers than ordinary sellers, which means that they can notably impact the providers' promoting prices.
Learn more about Price discrimination here: brainly.com/question/23342760
#SPJ4
Answer:
People behavior with lump sum amount:
The experimental evidence shows that people always expect to be treated fairly. When people are treated unfairly, then they will reject the offer regardless of the value of money. Thus, the statement that "should not generalize the evident resulted from $10 experiment. When the size of money is large then people will react differently from the evidence" is false.
Answer:
The answer is: Rose will be taxed as receiving a $15,000 dividend distribution.
Explanation:
Since Parent Corporation owns 70% of Child Corporation, for tax purposes they are considered as one single firm. Rose is the main stockholder of Parent Co. so for tax purposes she is also a stockholder in Child Co. When Child Co. gives her $15,000 in exchange for Parent Co. stock, this would be considered as a dividend distribution rather a stock sale.
Answer:
B. ask you boss which stuff takes priority and then make a list to remember.
Explanation:
