1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
mash [69]
3 years ago
12

Western Bank & Trust purchased land and a building for the lump sum of $3 million dollars. To get the maximum tax deduction,

Western allocated 90% of the purchase price to the building and only 10% to the land. A more realistic allocation would have been 70% to the building and 30% to the land.
Explain the tax advantage of allocating too much to the building and too little to the land.

Was Western's allocation ethical? If so, state why. If not, state why not. Identify who was harmed.
Business
1 answer:
leonid [27]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Because land never depreciates, Western Bank & Trust wanted to distribute a higher percentage of the purchase price to the building, rather than the land. By allocating 90% of the purchase price to the building, rather than a more accurate 70%, Western Bank & Trust increases the depreciation amount of the building each year. For tax purposes, the IRS requires that the Modified Accelerated Cost Recovery System (MACRS) be used as the depreciation method used by companies. Under this method, the IRS specifies the useful life for a specific asset. MACRS also ignores residual value of an asset at the end of its useful life. By stating that the building was worth 90% of the total purchase price, Western Bank is attempting to increase its tax deduction from the IRS, because only the building depreciates, not the land. This improper allocation of the total purchase amount violates GAAP principles, which require that accounting information be “relevant and have faithful representation.” The information must be “complete, neutral, and free from error” (Nobles, Mattison, & Matsumura, 2014). For Western Bank to provide complete, neutral, and free from error information, it should record the transaction honestly: 70% to the building, 30% to the land. This dishonest representation is harmful to the federal government in that it is allowing Western Bank to take more money than what it is owed. If these kinds of situations happen on a large scale, it could have a huge impact on the economy in general. Source: Nobles, T., Mattison, B., & Matsumura, E. M. (2014). Horngren's Accounting, 10th Edition. Pearson Education, Inc. Student 2

You might be interested in
In January 2021, Vega Corporation purchased a patent at a cost of $200,000. Legal and filing fees of $50,000 were paid to acquir
ale4655 [162]

Answer:

c. $215,000

Explanation:

The computation of the amount charged to income is shown below:

But before that first we have to determine the book value as on Jan 2024 which is

Total patent cost

= $200,000 + $50,000

= $250,000

Amortized cost till year 2024 is

= ($250,000 ÷ 10 years) × 3 years

= $75,000

The three years is counted from 2021 to 2024

Now

Book value on Jan 2024 is

= $250,000 - $75,000

= $175,000

So,

Amount charged to income  is

= $175,000 + $40,000

= $215,000

6 0
3 years ago
Laura's boss, Erik, constantly uses sexually explicit language while communicating with his female subordinates. Though many fem
Fittoniya [83]

Answer:

I shouldn't believe or think this will be viewed as offensive conduct because he doesn't threaten any lady throughout particular. A further explanation is given below.

Explanation:

  • Complaining about discrimination based on private orientation as either a misconduct action throughout Title VII of the 1964 civil rights legislation including 29 C.F.R. including its Federal EEO Action Process Portion 1614.
  • Instead of repeatedly being told by the organization that the allegations of private identity are usually processed within sections 1614 unless specifically requested by the complainant to use a different litigation procedure.
3 0
3 years ago
Atlas Corp. is considering two mutually exclusive projects. Both require an initial investment of $10,000 at t = 0. Project S ha
snow_lady [41]

Answer:

A) $56.5

Explanation:

Data:

Project S

Initial cost $10,000

Y1 CF = $6,000

y2 CF = $8,000

Project L

Initial Investment = $10,000

Y1-Y4 CF = $4,373

Solution:

<u>For Project S</u>

We shall prolong the project to four years so it can be easily compared to project L

Following shall be the cashflow stream:

Y0=-$10,000  Y1=$6,000  Y2=-$2,000($8,000 CF - $10,000 outlay for prolonging the project second time)  Y3=$6,000  Y4=$8,000

Now to discount the cashflow

NPV=-10000/(1+0.0925)^0+6000/(1+0.0925)^1-2000/(1+0.0925)^2+6000/(1+0.0925)^3+8000/(1+0.0925)^4

NPV=4033.40

<u>For Project L</u>

In order to calculate present value of the annuity, following formula will be used:

PV=PMT(1+(1/(1+r)^n)/r

<em>NPV = Initial outlay - PV</em>

4373(1+(1/(1+0.0925)^4)/0.0925=14089.9

NPV=-10000+14089.9

NPV=4089.9

Now, we can easily calculate how much value will the firm gain or lose if Project L is selected over Project S

Value=NPV(L)-NPV(S)

Value=4033.40-4089.90

Value=56.50

<em>*all figures are rounded off to two decimal points*</em>

7 0
3 years ago
An analyst with a national ratings agency is concerned about a firms ability to meet its short term obligations. To evaluate the
Semmy [17]

Answer:

a. Balance Sheet

Explanation:

The balance sheet reports the total assets, total liabilities and stockholder equity.  

The total asset is comprised of the current asset, fixed assets, and the intangible asset

The total liabilities comprise of current liabilities and long term liabilities

The aim to make the balance sheet is to analyze the liquidity, financial performance, position of the company

Whereas the cash flow statement shows the inflow and outflow of cash and the income statement records total revenues and total expenditures.  

8 0
3 years ago
Carlos Company had beginning inventory of $80,000, ending inventory of $110,000, cost of goods sold of $285,000, and sales reven
DerKrebs [107]

121.67 days

Days in inventory is a measure of the average number of days that inventory is held.

365 days / ($285,000 / (80000+110,000)/2))

365 / (285,000 / {190,000/2})

365/ (285000/95000)

365/3 = 121.67 (rounded)

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Match the items below to show the risks, benefits, and powers of stockholders. A. Risk of being a stockholder B. The benefit of
    15·2 answers
  • Marigold Corp. manufactures a product with a unit variable cost of $100 and a unit sales price of $181. Fixed manufacturing cost
    11·1 answer
  • the pure food and drug act was an example of progressive legislation to protect consumers. true false
    5·2 answers
  • David Harper, the marketing manager of a large cosmetic company, observes that when the company decreases the price of its premi
    5·1 answer
  • Protectionist measures designed to limit free trade and protect domestic jobs
    15·2 answers
  • Beerbo purchased a patent from Mitter Lite Co. for $1,000,000 on January 1, 2018. At that time, the patent's useful life was 10
    7·1 answer
  • A stock is expected to return 11% in a normal economy, 19% if the economy booms, and lose 8% if the economy moves into a recessi
    5·1 answer
  • Retained earnings Group of answer choices is unique to the corporate form of business. is an optional account in the partnership
    6·1 answer
  • Jacob works as a researcher for a car showroom. He's going to collect data about consumers' changing preferences, Interests, and
    7·2 answers
  • Ramort Company reports the following cost data for its single product. The company regularly sells 21,500 units of its product a
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!