1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Veronika [31]
2 years ago
12

Amy got into trouble last week. She was hanging out with some of her friends, and when they suggested that shoplifting would be

fun, she went along with the idea. High emotional stability Which of the following statements describe people who are high on Machiavellianism?
1. They know how to acquire and use power.
2. They thrive in highly structured work situations.
3. They manipulate others for personal gain.
4. They care more for others than for themselves.
5. They are more likely to be persuaded than to persuade.
Business
1 answer:
UkoKoshka [18]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: 1. High Agreeableness

2. They know how to acquire and use power.

They manipulate others for personal gain.

Explanation:

1. A Highly Agreeable person is one who kind and considerate for others. They are altruistic and are optimistic and will usually go along with other people's ideas because they trust easily. Amy is Highly Agreeable and that was why she went along with the idea.

2. Machiavellianism is a personality traits that involves the use of manipulation to gain personal goals. Considered individuals with low empathy, they are cold emotionally and don't care much for morality.

They are able to acquire and use power through this manipulation.

You might be interested in
Uncollectible accounts are determined by the​ percent-of-sales method to be ​% of credit sales. How much is​ uncollectible-accou
lesya [120]

Answer:

$1,160

Explanation:

<em>Hie, I have attached the full question as an image below.</em>

The firm usually makes provision for certain amounts so as not to overstate their profits. This expected as it is prudent than reporting profits that might never occur. Provisions of Uncollectible accounts are examples of such amounts.

An increase in Uncollectible amount compared to the opening balance is treated as an Expense in the Income Statement whilst a decrease is treated as an Income.

For this question, we are told that Uncollectible accounts are determined by the​ percent-of-sales method to be ​4% of credit sales. Thus calculation of the 2012 uncollectible-account expense is as follows :

Credit Sales - 2012 = $44,000

Beginning Balance in allowances = $600

Therefore,

Uncollectable Amount (2012) = Credit Sales x percent-of-sales

                                                 = $44,000 x 4%

                                                 = $1,760

The Uncollectable amount has increased by $1,160 ($1,760 - $600)

Conclusion :

The collectible-account expense for 2012 is $1,160

 

7 0
3 years ago
Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than
SashulF [63]

Complete Question:

Determine the utilization and the efficiency for each of these situations:

a. A loan processing operation that processes an average of 7 loans per day. The operation has a design capacity of 10 loans per

day and an effective capacity of 8 loans per day.

b. A furnace repair team that services an average of four furnaces a day if the design capacity is six furnaces a day and the

effective capacity is five furnaces a day.

c. Would you say that systems that have higher efficiency ratios than other systems will always have higher utilization ratios than

those other systems? Explain.

Explanation:

It's not (true) actually. Whether the design capacity is comparatively (high), the utilisation could be (low) even though the efficiency was (high).

Utilisation = Output / Design capacity = \frac{17}{10} x 100%

Efficiency = Output / Effective capacity = \frac{7}{8}

Utilisation = \frac{4}{6}

Efficiency  = \frac{4}{5}

U = 1000/2000

e = 1000/1000

4 0
3 years ago
Ways which business can help in controlling pollution​
Umnica [9.8K]

Answer:

Pollution permits are a market-based scheme aimed at reducing pollution and trying to encourage firms to reduce the quantity of pollution they create.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Your investment portfolio consists of ​$15 comma 000 invested in only one stocklong dashAmazon. Suppose the​ risk-free rate is 5
Kay [80]

Answer:

a)

The CAPM hypothesis states that the effective market is utilized place in the market and has the maximum eminent expected return of any assortment for a given randomness and the smallest variability for a assumed expected return. By allotment utilized place in the market assortment, you can achieve a standard return,

Thus,  

Expected Rate of Return = [Risk free Rate + Beta × (Market Risk - Risk free Rate)]

Beta = [Expected Rate of Return – Risk Free Rate] / [Market Risk - Risk free Rate]

Beta = [12% - 5%] / [10% -5%]

Beta = 7/5

Beta =1.4

The final possible instability while taking the same estimated rate of return as Amazon is $21,000 ($15,000 × 1.4) which indicate that it borrows $6,000 ($21,000 - $15,000). Now the -$6,000 is specified as strength benefit. So the volatility of the asset is,

Volatility = [Volatility of Asset x Beta]

Volatility = [18% × 1.4]

Volatility = 0.252 or 25.20%

Therefore the volatility is less than the volatility of Amazon.

b)

The market share has a instability of "n". The corresponding instability of Amazon will be 2.22 (40%/18%). So the assortment with the most notable predictable give back that has a faint variability from Amazon is $33,333.33 ($15,000x 2.22) which will be the market assortment and it also uses $18,333.33 ($33,333.33 - $15,000). Here the -$18,333.33 is specified as strength asset. So the return is,

Expected Return = [Risk free Rate + Beta × (Market Risk – Risk free Rate)]

Expected Return = [5%+ 122 × (10% - 5%)]

Expected Return = [5%+ 122 × 5%]

Expected Return = [0.05+0.111111]

Expected Return = 0.161111 or1 6.11%

Therefore the volatility is higher than the expected return of Amazon.

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of long-run equilibrium for a perfectly competitive firm? Select one:
adelina 88 [10]

Answer: <u>"b. Price is greater than long-run average cost."</u> is NOT characteristic of long-run equilibrium for a perfectly competitive firm.

Explanation: In the long term the company will produce the output level at which long-run average cost is at its minimum.

Where the price is equal to the long-run marginal cost and the long-run average cost.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A company is using a ______ pay structure in which more efficient workers earn higher wages.
    15·2 answers
  • Roseler Company uses a normal job-order costing system. The company has two departments through which most jobs pass. Overhead i
    12·1 answer
  • Gordon Jones is considering purchasing a computer from Best Buy. He has created a scale for rating eight different computers on
    9·1 answer
  • What are the costs and benefits of making​ an action plan for climate change?
    8·1 answer
  • Page Up and Page down fall in the _______ keys category
    12·1 answer
  • John, a mid-level manager, notices that all his subordinates are filling out their monthly reports incorrectly. He concludes tha
    14·1 answer
  • Sam's business will cost $49,500 to set up and run for the first year. Sam then expects an annual operational expense total of $
    6·1 answer
  • Suppose you make 30 annual investments in a fund that pays 3% compounded annually. If your first deposit is $6,000 and each succ
    5·2 answers
  • *WILL AWARD BRAINLIEST IF CORRECT!*
    7·1 answer
  • a firm installs 1500 air conditioners which need to be serviced every six months. the firm can hire a team from its logistics de
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!