This is a value assessment in the form of a subjective statement. According to this viewpoint, the period of jobless benefits should be increased. It cannot be verified by the evidence at hand. Therefore, it is a declaration of norm. In the case of a positive assertion, the statement is factual and can be put to the test using the information at hand. However, this claim is subjective and dependent on opinion.
<h3>
What is unemployment?</h3>
When someone actively searches for work but is unsuccessful, they are said to be unemployed. It is regarded as one of the important indicators of the health of the economy. The most popular technique for calculating a nation's unemployment rate is the unemployment rate. This may be calculated by simply dividing the entire population that makes up a country's work force by the number of unemployed persons. Governments at the federal, state, and municipal levels frequently work to provide job opportunities to those who fit the requirements they have established. Typically, work is made available to groups of people for a set minimum wage that is sufficient for basic survival and gives them more opportunities to find permanent jobs.
To know more about unemployment, visit;
brainly.com/question/14227610
#SPJ4
Answer:
As a result of the political unrest in Libya, the supply of oil would fall, As a result the supply curve would shift to the left. This would lead to fall in equilibrium quantity and a rise in price.
The increased demand for oil would shift the demand curve to the right. The equilibrium price and quantity would increase
Taking these two effects together, equilibrium price would rise and there would be an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity
Please check the attached image for a graph showing these shifts
b. As a result of the change in supply, supply would increase. This would increase equilibrium quantity and equilibrium price would fall. in addition with the increase in demand for oil, equilibrium quantity would rise and there would be an indeterminate effect on equilibrium quantity
Explanation:
Answer:
total net income = $109,000
Explanation:
given data
Blake receive = $103,000
Matthew capital account is credited = $3,000
solution
we know that both partner get equal part in remaining loss or income
so here Blake get $3,000 as share of the net income
so that here net income for the period, that will Blake's salary allowance + amount shared in both persons of net income
as that
total net income = $103,000 + $3,000 +$3,000
total net income = $109,000
The basis of Tobin's land was stepped up or down to the fair market value, and that value was $3,00,000.
<h3>What is inherited property?</h3>
When a death happens in a year, the ground of the property is travelled up or downbound to the fair market value on the day of death if there is an inheritance case.
The process of property to a successor or heirs upon the death of the owner, often known as succession. The term “inheritance” besides refers to the property.
Tobin has inherited a property from his father, that died in the present year, and the sightly market value on the date of death, according to the federal estate tax return, is $3,00,000. Tobin's basis in land is $3,00,000.
Learn more about the Federal estate, refer to:
brainly.com/question/14104041
#SPJ1
Answer:
d. the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality than a lexus
Explanation:
There are a number goods that over time, for a variety of reasons, transition from being a normal good to an inferior good or from being an inferior good to a normal good. One such example of a good is the Toyota Camry. In the 1980s, more income for a household usually resulted in more Camrys being purchased. However, today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.
How could this happen?
<u>This could only have happened because of a change in perception in households over time. </u>
It is stated in the Scenario that ''today more Toyota Camrys are purchased by households that have experienced a reduction in income.''
<u>That means Toyota Camry has become an inferior good that is purchased more when income falls.</u>
<u>Hence, the only reason the scenario would have occurred is that the camry becomes an inferior good because the good is now perceived as lower in quality</u> than a lexus
